2024 专家建议:亚洲心力衰竭患者铁缺乏的管理
A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Asia Heart failure Iron deficiency Iron compounds
Background: Iron deficiency is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF) and is independently associated with a worse quality-of-life and exercise capacity, as well as increased risk of hospitalization, regardless of anemia status. Although international guidelines have provided recommendations for the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF, guidelines in Asia are less established, and practical use of guidelines for management of iron deficiency is limited in the region.
Methods: A panel comprising cardiologists from China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand convened to share insights and provide guidance for the optimal management of iron deficiency in patients with HF, tailored for the Asian community.
Results: Expert opinions were provided for the screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of iron deficiency in patients with HF. It was recommended that all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction should be screened for iron deficiency, and iron-deficient patients should be treated with intravenous iron. Monitoring of iron levels in patients with HF should be carried out once or twice yearly. Barriers to the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF in the region include low awareness of iron deficiency amongst general physicians, lack of reimbursement for screening and treatment, and lack of proper facilities for administration of intravenous iron.
Conclusions: These recommendations provide a structured approach to the management of iron deficiency in patients with HF in Asia.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; APSC, Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 Dimension Ques tionnaire; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; Hb, hemoglobin; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ISC, iron sucrose; IV, intravenous; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio; PGA, patient global assessment; QoL, quality-of-life; RR, rate ratio; TSAT, transferrin saturation; $\mathrm{VO}_{2}$ , oxygen consumption; 6MWT, 6-min walk test.
\* Corresponding author at: National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Dr, 169609, Singapore. E-mail address: david.sim@singhealth.com.sg (D.K.L. Sim). 1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
D.K.L. Sim et al.
1. Introduction
Iron deficiency is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF), with a prevalence of up to $55\%$ in chronic HF, and up to $83\%$ in acute decompensated HF [ 1 ]. It is an independent predictor of poorer prog nostic outcomes in HF and is associated with a worse quality-of-life (QoL) and exercise capacity, as well as increased risk of hospitaliza tion, regardless of anemia status [ 2 – 6 ].
International guidelines for treating HF, such as the American Heart Association /American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America 2022 guidelines [ 7 ], European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 guidelines and 2023 update [ 8 , 9 ], and the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) consensus statements [ 10 ] have provided recom mendations for the management of iron deficiency in HF, but local guidelines in Asia are not as well-established, and practical use of guidelines for management of iron deficiency is limited in the region. The procedures for management of iron deficiency are not standardized across Asia and there is a paucity of clinical data [ 11 ], leading to inadequate awareness and treatment of this condition. Hence, a group of experts in Asia convened to discuss clinical gaps, and to provide rec ommendations to general physicians and cardiologists regarding the screening, treatment, and monitoring of iron deficiency in patients with HF to optimize clinical outcomes in the region.
2. Methods
A panel comprising cardiologists from China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand convened to share insights and provide guidance for the optimal management of iron deficiency in patients with HF, tailored for the Asian community. A PubMed search was conducted for available scientific data and literature (including meta-analyses, reviews, as well as global and Asia-Pacific specific clinical trials published from 2007 to 2022 pertaining to treatment of iron deficiency in HF), which were then reviewed and discussed in detail. Expert recommendations were agreed upon by the panel through multiple online and offline communications.
3. Results and expert recommendations
Based on recommendations from the expert panel and global guidelines, an algorithm for the management of iron deficiency in pa tients with HF in Asia for use in clinical practice was developed ( Fig. 1 ).
3.1. Screening and diagnosis
The disease burden of iron deficiency amongst patients with HF in Asia is high, with the prevalence ranging from $53\%–76\%$ [ 12 – 17 ], which is higher than that in Europe [ 2 , 3 , 18 ]. In a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian population, patients with HF $(n=751)$ ) had 3.5 times higher odds of iron deficiency than community-based controls $(n\,=\,601)$ ) [ 15 ]. Notably, the prevalence of iron deficiency in participants with or without HF was highest amongst Indian participants compared with Malay or Chinese participants (in patients with HF: $81.6\%$ vs $62.9\%$ vs $58.1\%$ , $p=0.001$ ; in participants without HF: $60.5\%$ vs $58.9\%$ vs $30.8\%$ , $p<0.001)$ ) [ 15 ], indicating that racial differences may be a predictor of iron deficiency in patients with HF. Although iron deficiency is a marker of severity in HF, which is associated with worsening QoL and a higher risk of hospitalization and mortality [ 3 – 6 ], screening for iron deficiency is performed in ${<}50\%$ of patients with HF due to lack of awareness, as well as the out-of-pocket costs involved. In a Taiwanese cohort $(N=$ 3612), less than one-fifth of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had a complete iron panel done at baseline [ 19 ]. Moreover, many physicians only screen for iron deficiency in the context of anemia or chronic kidney disease in patients with HF, which is reimbursed by the government in select countries, even though clinical trials have shown that intravenous (IV) iron is effective in iron-deficient
patients with HF, regardless of anemia status [ 20 – 23 ]. Hence, the under-screening and under-diagnosis of iron deficiency in patients with HF in Asia represent a pressing unmet need. Asian patients with acute decompensated HF manifest a more aggressive disease phenotype and at a younger age than patients from other regions [ 24 ], highlighting the critical need for detailed screening, such as for iron deficiency, in this population [ 24 ].
Iron deficiency in HF has been consistently defined as serum ferritin ${<}100\ \mathrm{ng/mL}$ , or serum ferritin $100{-}299~\mathrm{ng/mL}$ with transferrin satu ration (TSAT) ${<}20\%$ in clinical trials [ 20 – 23 , 25 ] and international guidelines [ 7 , 8 , 10 ]. A study in the United Kingdom showed that TSAT ${<}20\%$ and serum iron ${\leq}13\ \upmu\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{L}$ , but not ferritin levels, were inde pendently associated with greater all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in a univariable model [ 26 ].This diagnostic criteria has been validated in a Japanese cohort $(N=763)$ [ 27 ], but further research across larger populations in other Asian countries is required to apply this diagnostic criteria to clinical practice. Currently, the diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency are not well-established in Asian HF guide lines [ 28 – 33 ], resulting in physicians utilizing parameters that are not clinically validated, such as using serum iron levels to diagnose iron deficiency.
3.1.1. Expert opinion
All patients with HF in Asia should have an iron panel carried out to screen for iron deficiency, regardless of their hemoglobin (Hb) levels and renal function, as iron deficiency is an independent and strong predictor of outcomes in HF, and an important target for therapy [ 6 ].
Screening is simple and feasible, and iron deficiency should be defined as serum ferritin ${<}100~\mathrm{ng/mL}$ , or $100{-}299~\mathrm{ng/mL}$ and TSAT ${<}20\%$ [ 20 – 23 , 25 ]. Use of serum iron as a diagnostic marker requires further validation in clinical trials for HF and should not be used to di agnose iron deficiency in HF. Healthcare professionals (including bio chemists and pathologists who perform the tests) should be educated on the reference ranges for ferritin and TSAT levels recommended for the diagnosis of iron deficiency, so as to better identify patients with HF who are iron deficient. Inclusion of recommendations within country-specific guidelines for HF for the specific timing and setting for screening may further help to improve current screening rates for iron deficiency. Routine screening for iron deficiency in both inpatient and outpatient settings should be incorporated in hospital protocols regarding man agement of HF. Reimbursement and policies for implementation of screening can be explored at a national level. Since national health in surance in some countries covers screening of iron deficiency only in the context of anemia, some clinicians screen for iron deficiency only if the patient ’ s Hb levels are ${\leq}15\,g/\mathrm{{d}L}$ (as IV iron therapy is not recommended in patients with $\mathrm{Hb}\mathrm{>}15\mathrm{~}\mathrm{g/DL})$ [ 34 ]; however, screening should ideally be performed independently of anemia status.
3.2. Treatment
IV iron is recommended for the treatment of iron deficiency in pa tients with HF; it is well tolerated, improves patient outcomes such as exercise capacity, QoL, and New York Heart Association functional class [ 20 – 23 , 25 , 35 , 36 ], and prevents recurrent HF hospitalizations in symp tomatic iron-deficient patients with HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ${<}45–50\%$ ( Table 1 ) [ 20 – 23 , 25 , 35 – 38 ]. There is no ev idence for the benefit of oral iron in iron-deficient patients with HF. The IRONOUT-HF trial failed to show significant improvement in exercise capacity or QoL with the use of oral iron (ferric) polysaccharide compared with placebo in this patient population [ 39 ], and its use was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal side effects. The lack of benefit could be partially attributed to the poorer absorption compared with IV formulations, particularly in the context of HF where the thickness of the gut wall is increased [ 40 ].
Different IV iron formulations are available with distinct pharma cokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that lead to unique
2
D.K.L. Sim et al.
pharmacologic and safety profiles [ 41 ]; hence, in the absence of data, different iron products cannot be deemed clinically equivalent to each other. IV iron products evaluated for the treatment of iron deficiency in the setting of HF include ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), iron sucrose and ferric derisomaltose, with IV FCM having the most clinical evidence [ 37 , 42 ]. In the AFFIRM-AHF study [ 23 ], which was performed in iron-deficient patients with decompensated HF with LVEF ${\leq}50\%$ who had been admitted to hospital, IV FCM did not achieve a statistically sig nificant reduction of the primary composite endpoint of HF hospitali zations and CV death compared with placebo, although a trend towards reduction with the use of IV FCM was observed (rate ratio [RR] 0.79, $95\%$ confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 – 1.01; $\textit{p}=\ 0.059)$ ) [ 23 ]. This
reduction was driven mainly by the statistically significant reduction in HF hospitalizations (RR 0.74, $95\%$ CI: 0.58 – 0.94; p = 0.013) [ 23 ]. For IV ferric derisomaltose, the most recent randomized trial (the IRONMAN study), wherein a majority of the patients recruited were outpatients without recent hospitalization for HF, also narrowly missed statistical significance in reduction of the primary composite endpoint of recurrent HF hospitalizations and CV death when compared with standard care (RR 0.82, $95\%$ CI: 0.66 – 1.02; $p\,=\,0.0705$ ) [ 37 ]. Recent meta-analyses have included these trials to evaluate clinical outcomes with the use of IV iron [ 43 – 47 ]. In a meta-analysis of 10 studies $\left(N=3373\right)$ by Graham et al, use of IV iron resulted in an improvement in the composite outcome of recurrent HF hospitalizations and CV death (RR 0.75; $95\%$

Check Hb levels
IfHb13-15g/dLformalesor12-15g/dLforfemales,excludeactiveinfectionand malignancy IfHb<13g/dLformalesor<12g/dLforfemales,checkifanemiaisduetoiron deficiencyorotherclinicalcauses oIfotherclinicalcauses,treataccordingly.Otherwise,proceedwithiron deficiencytreatment IfHb>15g/dL,donottreatwithIViron
lrondeficiency treatment
Nobenefitoforalironiniron-deficientpatientswithHF
GiveIVirontreatmentforiron-deficientpatientswho:
·havechronicHF(outpatientadministration),or ·areadmittedfordecompensatedHF(priortodischarge)
IVFCMisthepreferredIVformulationtocorrectirondeficiencyinlinewiththecurrent breadthofdataavailableinHF.AdministerappropriatedosesofIVFCMbasedonthe patient'stotalironneed,calculatedusingthechartbelow
|HD|HD|HD||Patientbodyweight|Patientbodyweight|| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |||mmoI/L|||||
OtherIVformulationsincludeIVironsucroseandIVferricderisomaltose;theirclinical useanddosageshouldbeinlinewiththeirspecificclinicaldatainHF
 Checkserumferritin,TSATandHb
·atnextappointment(preferablyafter3months) ·1-2 timesper year thereafter, depending on severity of HF and iron deficiency
Fig. 1. Proposed algorithm for management of iron deficiency in patients with heart failure in Asia. a In countries where screening for iron deficiency is reimbursed only in the context of anemia, clinicians typically screen for iron deficiency only if the patient ’ s Hb levels are lower than $15\ \mathrm{g}/\mathrm{{dL};}$ however, iron deficiency in HF should ideally be screened regardless of Hb levels.
b Dosing information obtained from Singapore ’ s Ferinject package insert: dosing is similar in China, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Thailand; adminis tration differs in Pakistan, Japan, and South Korea. Please refer to the country-specific package insert or prescribing information for appropriate dosing information. Doses specified are applicable to IV FCM only. A single administration should not exceed 15 mg iron/kg body weight for IV injection or 20 mg iron/kg body weight for IV infusion, and $1000~\mathrm{mg}$ of iron.
FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; Hb, hemoglobin; HF, heart failure; IV, intravenous; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; TSAT, transferrin saturation.
D.K.L. Sim et al.
Table 1 Summary of selected clinical trials of intravenous iron in patients with heart failure.
|| IV iron sucrose| IV iron sucrose|IV FCM|IV FCM|IV FCM|IV FCM||| IV ferric derisomaltose | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| || Toblli et al. [35] | FERRIC-HF [25] | IRON-HF [36】 | FAIR-HF [221 | CONFIRM-HF 【20】 | EFFECT-HF [211 | AFFIRM-AHF [23】 |HEART-FID [38]| IRONMAN [371 | | Year Sample size | 2007 40 |2008|2013| 2009 459 || 2017 172 |2020|2023|2022| |Efficacy| 2007 40 |35|18|| 2015 304 ||1108|3065|1137| |Efficacy|Significantly| Significantly improved |Increment| Significantly improved | Significantly improved |Favorable|21% risk|No statistical|18% risk| |Efficacy| improved LVEF, | improved peak VO2/kg, |||| effect on peak VO2, |reduction in the|difference in|reduction of| |Efficacy|MLHFQ| peak VO2/kg, NYHA class |functional| PGA, NYHA class, 6MWT, |6MWT (from||combined|hierarchical|primary| |Efficacy| score, and 6MWT || capacity (increment || Week 24),PGA (from Week 12), |significant|endpoint of total| composite of death within 12 |composite| |Efficacy| score, and 6MWT |(at Week 18),|| EQ-5D, KCcQ score ||improvement|HE||endpoint of| |Efficacy| score, and 6MWT ||in peak| (all from Week4) | NYHA class (from Week 24), |in PGA (from| hospitalization and cV death,b | months after randomization, |recurrent| |Efficacy||||| (from Week 24), fatigue score | Week 12) and NYHA |trend towards|hospitalizations| hospitalizations for HF and CV | |||(at Week 18)||| (from Week 12), improved KCCQ |functional|reduction of|for HF within 12|death,b| |||||||class (from|hospitalization,|months after|improvements in| |||||| and EQ-5D, reduced hospitalization for worsening |Week 6)| no difference in CVdeath |randomization,|MLHFQ score| |||||| and EQ-5D, reduced hospitalization for worsening || CVdeath between FCM | or change in 6- min walk |and 6MWT| |||||||| between FCM and placebo |distance from|| |Safety|Not reported|||||||baseline to 6|| |||Generally well-tolerated||||||months||
CV, cardiovascular; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; HF, heart failure; IV, intravenous; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PGA, patient global assessment; $\mathrm{V}\mathrm{O}_{2s}$ , oxygen consumption; 6MWT, 6-min walk test. a Post-hoc analysis. b Narrowly missed statistical significance.
CI: 0.61 – 0.93; $p<0.01]$ ), as well as for recurrent HF hospitalizations (RR 0.67; $95\%$ CI: 0.47 – 0.97; $p=0.03)$ ), but no difference was observed for CV or all-cause mortality [ 43 ]. These findings were supported by other meta-analyses [ 44 , 46 , 47 ]. In contrast, in the HEART-FID trial $(N=$ 3065), no apparent difference was observed between FCM and placebo with respect to the hierarchical composite of death, HF hospitalizations, and 6-min walk distance (unmatched win ratio 1.10; $99\%$ CI: 0.99 – 1.23) [ 38 ]. The lack of benefit in reducing HF hospitalizations that was pre viously observed in the meta-analyses and clinical trials could be partially attributed to the lower-risk patient population enrolled in the HEART-FID trial (only ambulatory patients enrolled), compared with the IRONMAN trial ( $.15\%$ of patients enrolled were hospitalized) and the AFFIRM-AHF trial (all enrolled patients were hospitalized) [ 38 ]. Data on the role of IV iron in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), as well as longer-term studies on chronic HF patients are awaited ( Table 2 ) [ 48 – 50 ].
Clinical trials on the use of IV iron in HF have mainly been conducted in Western populations, and data on the use in Asian patients are scarce. The large-scale AFFIRM-AHF and IRONMAN cohorts included $4.3\%$ and $5.8\%$ Asians, respectively, and the data for the individual races within these cohorts are unavailable [ 23 , 37 ]. These studies were mainly con ducted in Western countries [ 37 ], with only the AFFIRM-AHF trial having a Singapore site; IV FCM was found to be effective in the overall
population and country-specific data are currently unavailable [ 23 ]. There were no Asian patients in other trials such as FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF, as these were mainly conducted in Europe and South America [ 20 , 51 ]. A single-center randomized controlled study in Malaysian patients who were treated with IV iron isomaltoside versus oral iron for 12 months $(N=65)$ ) reported an improvement in the pro portion of patients achieving iron repletion (IV iron: $90.9\%$ vs oral iron: $56.2\%$ ) and a larger increase in 6-min walk time (6MWT) from baseline (IV iron: $42.98\%$ vs oral iron: $8.61\%$ ) [ 52 ]. A pilot study in Southeast Asian patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF and iron deficiency $(N\,=\,50)$ ) reported a non-significant difference in 6MWT distance (adjusted mean difference: 0.9 m; $95\%$ CI: − 30.2 – 32.0; $p=$ 0.607) and no difference in QoL in patients who recevied either IV FCM or placebo; however, the negative results may be due to the study ’ s small sample size and short follow-up duration of 12 weeks [ 11 ]. A longer follow-up duration may be required to observe a larger benefit, given that IV FCM significantly improved 6MWT only after 24 weeks of IV FCM use in the CONFIRM-HF trial [ 20 ].
Clinical data have shown that IV iron is generally well tolerated in patients with HF, even in the small percentage of Asian patients included in pivotal trials and smaller independent studies [ 11 , 20 , 22 , 23 ]. In a meta-analysis of five studies which provided adverse event (AE) data, similar proportion of patients reported at least one AE (IV iron: $62.9\%$ ;
Table 2 Summary of ongoing clinical trials of intravenous iron in patients with heart failure.
|Studies|FAIR-HF2 [48]|PREFER-HF [49]|FAIR-HFpEF [50]| |---|---|---|---| |Phase|||| |Patient|Chronic HFrEF| HFpEF || |population|||HFpEF| |Enrollment|1200||200| | Iron compound|FCM|FCM|FCM| |Comparator|Placebo|Placebo, oral ferroglycine sulfate, oral|Placebo| ||||| |Primary|Composite rate of recurrent HF hospitalizations and CV deaths for a minimum| Change in 6MWT after 24 weeks| Change in 6MWT after 52| |endpoint|averagefollow-up of 2years||weeks|
CV, cardiovascular; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction;6MWT, 6-min walk test.
D.K.L. Sim et al.
control: $63.6\%$ ) and the number of AEs reported were similar across both groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; $95\%$ CI: 0.79 – 1.22; $p=0.50$ ) [ 42 ]. Moreover, the incidence of serious AEs was significantly lower in the IV iron group than the control group (OR 0.77; $95\%$ CI: 0.63 – 0.96; $p=$ 0.0175) as was the incidence of premature discontinuation of study medication (OR 0.70; $95\%$ CI: 0.52 – 0.94; $p=0.0172\$ ) [ 42 ]. Although the use of IV iron has raised concerns about hypersensitivity reactions and infections, no increased risk has been observed in clinical trials and meta analyses [ 37 , 42 , 46 ]. IV iron should be used with caution in pa tients with acute or chronic infections, and discontinued in patients with ongoing bacteremia [ 53 ]. Hypophosphatemia has been observed with the use of IV FCM in patients receiving more frequent doses or higher cumulative doses [ 54 , 55 ], although only transient lowering of phos phate levels was reported between patients who received IV FCM and those who received placebo in the AFFIRM-AHF trial [ 23 ].
IV iron supplementation is recommended by ESC 2023 HF guidelines update in symptomatic iron-deficient patients with HFrEF (LVEF ${\leq}40\%$ ) or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF; LVEF $41–49\%$ ) to alleviate HF symptoms and improve quality-of-life (Class I, Level A); either IV FCM or ferric derisomaltose can be used to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization (Class IIa, Level A) [ 9 ], based on efficacy data from prospective clinical trials and meta analyses [ 9 ]. However, the guide lines mentioned that most of the evidence is from patients with LVEF ${\leq}45\%$ [ 9 ]. The APSC 2023 consensus recommended the use of IV FCM in iron-deficient patients with HFrEF (moderate level of evidence), whereas the Korean Society of Heart Failure 2023 guidelines recom mend IV iron supplementation in iron-deficient patients with LVEF ${<}50\%$ who were recently hospitalized for acute HF (Class IIa, Level B) [ 10 , 56 ]. IV FCM has been shown to be highly cost-effective across healthcare systems in Europe and USA, driven by reduced healthcare costs due to decreased HF hospitalizations and better health status of patients with HF, which offsets the treatment costs [ 57 ]. The use of IV FCM was also found to be cost-effective compared with placebo for patients with chronic HF and iron-deficiency anemia under the Korean healthcare system [ 58 ]. To our knowledge, this is the only cost-effectiveness trial conducted in Asia for IV iron in patients with HF.
Many Asian guidelines do not provide any guidance or provide un clear recommendations on the management of iron deficiency in HF [ 28 – 33 ], with only a few recommending treatment with IV iron [ 10 , 30 , 33 , 56 , 59 ], even though FCM, iron sucrose, and ferric deriso maltose are available in most countries in Asia. Although the HF Council of Thailand recommends IV iron treatment for iron deficiency in HF, the use of IV iron in this setting is still uncommon [ 59 ]. Nanosimilars of these IV iron products are also available in some countries in Asia [ 60 ]. Datasets have shown that due to the complex nanocolloidal structure of the molecules, there are physicochemical differences between IV iron products and their nanosimilars, resulting in differential iron release; this is also highly dependent on the manufacturing process [ 60 ]. This may result in altered pharmacological and clinical properties compared with the original molecules, including variable dosages and efficacy, as well as safety [ 61 – 64 ]. Thus, in the absence of clinical data, it would be difficult to ascertain therapeutic equivalence of such molecules before they can be used regularly in clinical practice [ 65 ].
Many general cardiologists and physicians in Asia do not use IV iron due to lack of awareness, unfamiliarity with IV iron, lack of reim bursement, or proper facilities to administer IV therapy; a notable pro portion of Asian patients with HF are still being treated with oral iron, which has been shown to be ineffective in clinical trials [ 39 ]. For example, in a prospective multicenter study in Korea $(N=461)$ ), only $0.2\%$ of acute HF patients with anemia and iron deficiency received IV iron, while $13.2\%$ were treated with oral iron [ 17 ].
3.2.1. Expert opinion
All symptomatic patients with HF with LVEF ${<}45\%$ and iron defi ciency should receive treatment with IV iron for improvement of QoL and clinical outcomes; oral iron should not be used due to its lack of
efficacy in patients with HF. Based on the ESC 2023 update, either IV FCM or ferric derisomaltose can be used to reduce the risk of HF hos pitalization in symptomatic patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF, whereas IV FCM is the preferred IV formulation in the APSC 2023 consensus, due to the magnitude of data available for IV FCM [ 9 , 10 ]. Other IV iron products with distinct pharmacological properties have also been effective in improving exercise capacity and QoL.
The expert group believes that these recommendations will help improve scientific awareness on the necessity and cost effectiveness of IV iron for treatment of iron deficiency in HF. Although cost-effectiveness analyses have been conducted in South Korea for FCM use in iron deficiency anemia associated with HF [ 58 ], further studies focused on the health economic outcomes of treating iron deficiency set in the local context may improve eventual access to therapies in the region. As clinical trials evaluating the use of IV iron were carried out in a predominantly Western population, larger clinical studies with longer follow-up duration in Asian countries should be conducted to confirm the benefit of IV versus oral iron in Asian patients with HF. Subgroup analyses of major clinical trials, such as the AFFIRM-AHF and IRONMAN trials, may also help confirm this benefit. Cardiologists and general physicians should encourage iron-deficient patients with HF to enroll in ongoing clinical trials for IV iron products ( Table 2 ), and to treat their patients for this condition.
3.3. Administration of IV iron
IV iron can be administered in an inpatient or outpatient setting. Inpatient administration is justified and often reimbursed since patients admitted for acute decompensated HF have a high risk of rehospitali zation, which is reduced by the use of IV iron [ 23 ]; patients can be monitored in a controlled environment during these infusion proced ures. Outpatient administration for chronic HF patients is cost-efficient, but in Asia, challenges include the lack of awareness amongst doctors on the management of iron deficiency, a lack of a dedicated outpatient facility to administer IV iron and monitor patients post-treatment, and limited insurance coverage.
3.3.1. Expert opinion
Administration of IV iron is effective in an inpatient or outpatient setting; IV iron should not be replaced with oral iron due to the lack of clinical benefit. In the clinical setting of each country, the optimal administration should be based on availability of facilities and trained manpower to ensure timely and appropriate IV iron administration for patients with chronic HF.
Increasing outpatient infusion facilities for patients who require an IV infusion for a short duration will allow for a simple, straightforward IV iron administration process, as most patients with chronic HF require only 1 – 2 doses annually. To allow for efficient allocation of resources, such outpatient infusion facilities may be set up within an outpatient HF clinic, or as a joint facility with antibiotic infusion centers, blood transfusion centers, or daycare facilities; these additions are currently being implemented in some countries in Asia.
3.4. Post-treatment monitoring
The ESC 2021 HF guidelines recommend for periodic screening of iron status in patients with HF (Class I, Level C) [ 8 ]. Practical guidelines in Europe recommend checking ferritin and TSAT levels in patients with HF treated for iron deficiency at their next scheduled visit (approxi mately after 3 months), and once or twice per year thereafter, depending on the severity of HF and iron deficiency [ 34 ]. In Asia, routine moni toring of iron status is not commonly carried out due to a lack of awareness and cost of screening.
3.4.1. Expert opinion
Ferritin, TSAT, and Hb levels should be checked at the next
5
D.K.L. Sim et al.
scheduled visit after treatment of iron deficiency, preferably after 3 months.
Periodic monitoring of iron deficiency should be carried out every 6 months or annually for all patients with HF.
4. Conclusion
Through the insights shared by the expert panel, this set of expert recommendations provides guidance for the management of iron defi ciency in patients with HF in Asia. Furthermore, it increases awareness amongst cardiologists, as well as general internal medicine physicians, who manage many patients with HF and play a major role in screening and treating comorbidities in HF. Treatment of iron deficiency in HF helps prevent recurrent hospitalizations due to worsening HF, whilst also improving patient QoL; thus, appropriate treatment with IV iron will help optimize clinical outcomes and reach treatment goals for pa tients with HF in the region.
Funding
Medical writing support for the manuscript was funded by CSL Vifor, via a medical writing grant. Authors maintained full control, and the funder was not involved in the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
David Kheng Leng Sim: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. Sanjay Mittal: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Jian Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Conceptu alization. Chung-Lieh Hung: Writing – review & editing, Conceptuali zation. Wan Ahmad Wan Azman: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Jin-Oh Choi: Writing – review & editing, Concep tualization. Teerapat Yingchoncharoen: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Aileen Cynthia F. De Lara: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Hiroshi Ito: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Tariq Ashraf: Writing – review & editing, Concep tualization. Kai-Hang Yiu: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualiza tion. Rungroj Krittayaphong: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Conflicts of interest
David Kheng Leng Sim has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Sanjay Mittal has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Zhang Jian has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for partici pation in an advisory board meeting. Chung-Lieh Hung has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Wan Ahmad Wan Azman has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Jin-Oh Choi has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for partic ipation in an advisory board meeting. Teerapat Yingchoncharoen has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Aileen Cynthia F. De Lara has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Hiroshi Ito has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for partici pation in an advisory board meeting. Tariq Ashraf has no conflicts of interest to declare. Kai-Hang Yiu has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting. Rungroj Krittayaphong has received an honorarium from CSL Vifor for participation in an advisory board meeting.
Acknowledgments
Independent medical writing support was provided by Radhika Das Chakraborty, PhD, and Loh Zhi Yang of MediTech Media, Nucleus Global, Singapore.
References
[1] C. Rizzo, R. Carbonara, R. Ruggieri, A. Passantino, D. Scrutinio, Iron deficiency: a new target for patients with heart failure, Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8 (2021) 709872 . [2] I.T. Klip, J. Comin-Colet, A.A. Voors, P. Ponikowski, C. Enjuanes, W. Banasiak, et al., Iron deficiency in chronic heart failure: an international pooled analysis, Am. Heart J. 165 (2013) 575 – 582 . [3] E.A. Jankowska, P. Rozentryt, A. Witkowska, J. Nowak, O. Hartmann, B. Ponikowska, et al., Iron deficiency: an ominous sign in patients with systolic chronic heart failure, Eur. Heart J. 31 (2010) 1872 – 1880 . [4] R.C. Martin, D. Lisi, Iron deficiency in heart failure: characteristics and treatment, Curr. Geriatr. Rep. 10 (2021) 196 – 205 . [5] C. Enjuanes, I.T. Klip, J. Bruguera, M. Cladellas, P. Ponikowski, W. Banasiak, et al., Iron deficiency and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure: results from a multicenter European study, Int. J. Cardiol. 174 (2014) 268 – 275 . [6] I.S. Anand, P. Gupta, Anemia and iron deficiency in heart failure: current concepts and emerging therapies, Circulation. 138 (2018) 80 – 98 . [7] Writing Committee Members; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members, 2022 AHA/ ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure, J. Card. Fail. 28 (2022) e1 – e167 . [8] T.A. McDonagh, M. Metra, M. Adamo, R.S. Gardner, A. Baumbach, M. Bohm, et al., 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, Eur. Heart J. 42 (2021) 3599 – 3726 . [9] T.A. McDonagh, M. Metra, M. Adamo, R.S. Gardner, A. Baumbach, M. Bohm, et al., 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, Eur. Heart J. 44 (2023) 3627 – 3639 . [10] D. Sim, W. Lin, A. Sindone, T. Yingchoncharoen, H.S. Prameswari, A.M. Ghazi, et al., Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology consensus statements on the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure, J. Asian Pac. Soc. Cardiol. 2 (2023) e10 . [11] T.J. Yeo, P.S.D. Yeo, F.A. Hadi, T. Cushway, K.Y. Lee, F.F. Yin, et al., Single-dose intravenous iron in Southeast Asian heart failure patients: a pilot randomized placebo-controlled study (PRACTICE-ASIA-HF), ESC Heart Fail. 5 (2018) 344 – 353 . [12] S.K. Sharma, S.K. Agarwal, K. Bhargava, M. Sharma, K. Chopra, G. Arumugam, Prevalence and spectrum of iron deficiency in heart failure patients in South Rajasthan, Indian Heart J. 68 (2016) 493 – 497 . [13] P.C. Negi, M. Dev, P. Paul, D. Pal Singh, S. Rathoure, R. Kumar, et al., Prevalence, risk factors, and significance of iron deficiency and anemia in nonischemic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction from a Himachal Pradesh heart failure registry, Indian Heart J. 70 (Suppl. 3) (2018). S182-S8 . [14] H. Arora, J.P.S. Sawhney, A. Mehta, A. Mohanty, Anemia profile in patients with congestive heart failure a hospital based observational study, Indian Heart J. 70 (Suppl. 3) (2018). S101-S4 . [15] T.J. Yeo, P.S. Yeo, R. Ching-Chiew Wong, H.Y. Ong, K.T. Leong, F. Jaufeerally, et al., Iron deficiency in a multi-ethnic Asian population with and without heart failure: prevalence, clinical correlates, functional significance and prognosis, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 16 (2014) 1125 – 1132 . [16] A. Bhandari, P. Shah, N.K. Pandey, R. Nepal, O. Sherchand, Anaemia among patients of heart failure in a tertiary care Centre of Nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study, J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 59 (2021) 833 – 838 . [17] J.J. Park, M. Yoon, H.W. Cho, S.E. Lee, J.O. Choi, B.S. Yoo, et al., Iron deficiency in Korean patients with heart failure, J. Korean Med. Sci. 38 (2023) e177 . [18] S. von Haehling, U. Gremmler, M. Krumm, F. Mibach, N. Schon, J. Taggeselle, et al., Prevalence and clinical impact of iron deficiency and anaemia among outpatients with chronic heart failure: the PrEP registry, Clin. Res. Cardiol. 106 (2017) 436 – 443 . [19] H.P. Sung, C.Y. Hsu, Y.H. Lee, P.L. Lin, C.T. Liao, F.P. Chung, et al., Iron deficiency in Taiwanese patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 86 (2023) 725 – 731 . [20] P. Ponikowski, D.J. van Veldhuisen, J. Comin-Colet, G. Ertl, M. Komajda, V. Mareev, et al., Beneficial effects of long-term intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with symptomatic heart failure and iron deficiency, Eur. Heart J. 36 (2015) 657 – 668 . [21] D.J. van Veldhuisen, P. Ponikowski, P. van der Meer, M. Metra, M. Bohm, A. Doletsky, et al., Effect of ferric carboxymaltose on exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency, Circulation. 136 (2017) 1374 – 1383 . [22] S.D. Anker, J. Comin Colet, G. Filippatos, R. Willenheimer, K. Dickstein, H. Drexler, et al., Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency, N. Engl. J. Med. 361 (2009) 2436 – 2448 . [23] P. Ponikowski, B.A. Kirwan, S.D. Anker, T. McDonagh, M. Dorobantu, J. Drozdz, et al., Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial, Lancet. 396 (2020) 1895 – 1904 . [24] J.J. Atherton, C.S. Hayward, W.A. Wan Ahmad, B. Kwok, J. Jorge, A.F. Hernandez, et al., Patient characteristics from a regional multicenter database of acute decompensated heart failure in Asia Pacific (ADHERE international-Asia Pacific), J. Card. Fail. 18 (2012) 82 – 88 .
D.K.L. Sim et al.
[25] D.O. Okonko, A. Grzeslo, T. Witkowski, A.K. Mandal, R.M. Slater, M. Roughton, et al., Effect of intravenous iron sucrose on exercise tolerance in anemic and nonanemic patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and iron deficiency FERRIC-HF: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51 (2008) 103 – 112 . [26] G. Masini, F.J. Graham, P. Pellicori, J.G.F. Cleland, J.J. Cuthbert, S. Kazmi, et al., Criteria for iron deficiency in patients with heart failure, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 79 (2022) 341 – 351 . [27] A. Tada, T. Nagai, T. Koya, M. Nakao, S. Ishizaka, Y. Mizuguchi, et al., Applicability of new proposed criteria for iron deficiency in Japanese patients with heart failure, ESC Heart Fail. 10 (2023) 985 – 994 . [28] H. Tsutsui, M. Isobe, H. Ito, H. Ito, K. Okumura, M. Ono, et al., JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure – digest version, Circ. J. 83 (2019) 2084 – 2184 . [29] M.S. Kim, J.H. Lee, E.J. Kim, D.G. Park, S.J. Park, J.J. Park, et al., Korean guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure, Korean Circ. J. 47 (2017) 555 – 643 . [30] X. Wang, C. Zhang, Cardiovascular Group GBCMA, Editing Group of the Chinese Expert Consensus on the D, Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure in Elderly P, Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure in elderly patients (2021), Aging Med. (Milton) 5 (2022) 78 – 93 . [31] Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Heart Failure, 4th edition, 2019. https://malaysianheart.org/files/5d6f717e6d58e.pdf . Acessed December 2023. [32] C.C. Wang, C.K. Wu, M.L. Tsai, C.M. Lee, W.C. Huang, H.H. Chou, et al., 2019 focused update of the guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, Acta Cardiol. Sin. 35 (2019) 244 – 283 . [33] W.K.B. Kwok, H.Y. Ong, S.P.C. Lam, C. Ching, K.T. Leong, T.S. Yaw, et al., 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure – A Comprehensive Updated Guideline from the Heart Failure Society (Singapore), Available from: https://www.hfss.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Singapor e-Heart-Failure-Guidelines-2020.pdf , 2020. [34] A. Sindone, W. Doehner, N. Manito, T. McDonagh, A. Cohen-Solal, T. Damy, et al., Practical guidance for diagnosing and treating iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: why, who and how? J. Clin. Med. 11 (2022) 2976 . [35] J.E. Toblli, A. Lombrana, P. Duarte, F. Di Gennaro, Intravenous iron reduces NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide in anemic patients with chronic heart failure and renal insufficiency, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50 (2007) 1657 – 1665 . [36] L. Beck-da-Silva, D. Piardi, S. Soder, L.E. Rohde, A.C. Pereira-Barretto, D. de Albuquerque, et al., IRON-HF study: a randomized trial to assess the effects of iron in heart failure patients with anemia, Int. J. Cardiol. 168 (2013) 3439 – 3442 . [37] P.R. Kalra, J.G.F. Cleland, M.C. Petrie, E.A. Thomson, P.A. Kalra, I.B. Squire, et al., Intravenous ferric derisomaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency in the UK (IRONMAN): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial, Lancet. 400 (2023) 2199 – 2209 . [38] R.J. Mentz, J. Garg, F.W. Rockhold, J. Butler, C.G. De Pasquale, J.A. Ezekowitz, et al., Ferric carboxymaltose in heart failure with iron deficiency, N. Engl. J. Med. 389 (2023) 975 – 986 . [39] G.D. Lewis, R. Malhotra, A.F. Hernandez, S.E. McNulty, A. Smith, G.M. Felker, et al., Effect of oral iron repletion on exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency: the IRONOUT HF randomized clinical trial, JAMA. 317 (2017) 1958 – 1966 . [40] S. von Haehling, N. Ebner, R. Evertz, P. Ponikowski, S.D. Anker, Iron deficiency in heart failure: an overview, JACC Heart Fail. 7 (2019) 36 – 46 . [41] F. Funk, B. Fluhmann, A.E. Barton, Criticality of surface characteristics of intravenous iron-carbohydrate nanoparticle complexes: implications for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (2022) 2140 . [42] A. Sindone, W. Doehner, J. Comin-Colet, Systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous iron-carbohydrate complexes in HFrEF patients with iron deficiency, ESC Heart Fail. 10 (2023) 44 – 56 . [43] F.J. Graham, P. Pellicori, P.R. Kalra, I. Ford, D. Bruzzese, J.G.F. Cleland, Intravenous iron in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: an updated meta-analysis, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 25 (2023) 528 – 537 . [44] M. Hamed, S.A. Elseidy, A. Ahmed, R. Thakker, H. Mansoor, H. Khalili, et al., Intravenous iron therapy among patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Heliyon. 9 (2023) e17245 . [45] S.D. Anker, M.S. Khan, J. Butler, S. von Haehling, E.A. Jankowska, P. Ponikowski, et al., Effect of intravenous iron replacement on recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: a Bayesian meta-analysis, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 25 (2023) 1080 – 1090 . [46] D. Vukadinovic, A. Abdin, I. Emrich, P.C. Schulze, S. von Haehling, M. Bohm, Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron repletion in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Res. Cardiol. 112 (2023) 954 – 966 . [47] H.M. Salah, G. Savarese, G.M.C. Rosano, A.P. Ambrosy, R.J. Mentz, M. Fudim, Intravenous iron infusion in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis, ESC Heart Fail. 10 (2023) 1473 – 1480 . [48] ClinicalTrials.gov, Intravenous iron in patients with systolic heart failure and iron deficiency to improve morbidity & mortality (FAIR-HF2), Available from, https: //classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03036462 (accessed July 2023), 2024. [49] ClinicalTrials.gov, Effects of iron therapy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and iron deficiency (PREFER-HF), Available from, https://classic.clinicaltr ials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03833336 (accessed July 2023), 2024. [50] ClinicalTrials.gov, Effect of IV iron in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (FAIR-HFpEF), Available from, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/c t2/show/NCT03074591 (accessed July 2023), 2024. [51] S.D. Anker, J.C. Colet, G. Filippatos, R. Willenheimer, K. Dickstein, H. Drexler, et al., Rationale and design of Ferinject assessment in patients with IRon deficiency and chronic heart failure (FAIR-HF) study: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of intravenous iron supplementation in patients with and without anaemia, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 11 (2009) 1084 – 1091 . [52] T. Lee, K.C. Teh, R. Sundram, A. Ariff, A. Roslan, M. Sundarajoo, et al., The I4RON-HF study, intravenous iron isomaltoside for inpatients versus outpatient Asians with heart failure, Eur. Heart J. 43 (2022) ehac544.1054 . [53] T. McDonagh, T. Damy, W. Doehner, C.S.P. Lam, A. Sindone, P. van der Meer, et al., Screening, diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency in chronic heart failure: putting the 2016 European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines into clinical practice, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 20 (2018) 1664 – 1672 . [54] G. Rosano, I. Schiefke, U.M. Gohring, V. Fabien, S. Bonassi, J. Stein, A pooled analysis of serum phosphate measurements and potential hypophosphataemia events in 45 interventional trials with ferric carboxymaltose, J. Clin. Med. (2020) 9 . [55] V. Sari, R. Atiqi, E.J. Hoorn, A.C. Heijboer, T. van Gelder, D.A. Hesselink, Ferric carboxymaltose-induced hypophosphataemia after kidney transplantation, Neth. J. Med. 75 (2017) 65 – 73 . [56] S.M. Park, S.Y. Lee, M.H. Jung, J.C. Youn, D. Kim, J.Y. Cho, et al., Korean society of heart failure guidelines for the management of heart failure: management of the underlying etiologies and comorbidities of heart failure, Korean Circ. J. 53 (2023) 425 – 451 . [57] P. McEwan, P. Ponikowski, J.A. Davis, G. Rosano, A.J.S. Coats, F. Dorigotti, et al., Ferric carboxymaltose for the treatment of iron deficiency in heart failure: a multinational cost-effectiveness analysis utilising AFFIRM-AHF, Eur. J. Heart Fail. 23 (2021) 1687 – 1697 . [58] E.A. Lim, H.S. Sohn, H. Lee, S.E. Choi, Cost-utility of ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject ® ) for iron-deficiency anemia patients with chronic heart failure in South Korea, Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 12 (2014) 19 . [59] S. Chirakarnjanakorn, R. Krittayaphong, T. Chantrarat, K. Ratanasumawong, S. B. Songmuang, Heart failure Council of Thailand (HFCT) 2019 heart failure guideline: comorbidity in heart failure, J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 102 (2019) 508 – 512 . [60] J.E. Toblli, G. Cao, L. Oliveri, M. Angerosa, Comparison of oxidative stress and inflammation induced by different intravenous iron sucrose similar preparations in a rat model, Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets 11 (2012) 66 – 78 . [61] M.L. Aguera, A. Martin-Malo, M.A. Alvarez-Lara, V.E. Garcia-Montemayor, P. Canton, S. Soriano, et al., Efficiency of original versus generic intravenous iron formulations in patients on haemodialysis, PLoS One 10 (2015) e0135967 . [62] J. Stein, A. Dignass, K.U. Chow, Clinical case reports raise doubts about the therapeutic equivalence of an iron sucrose similar preparation compared with iron sucrose originator, Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28 (2012) 241 – 243 . [63] E.S. Lee, B.R. Park, J.S. Kim, G.Y. Choi, J.J. Lee, I.S. Lee, Comparison of adverse event profile of intravenous iron sucrose and iron sucrose similar in postpartum and gynecologic operative patients, Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 29 (2013) 141 – 147 . [64] J. Rottembourg, A. Kadri, E. Leonard, A. Dansaert, A. Lafuma, Do two intravenous iron sucrose preparations have the same efficacy? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26 (2011) 3262 – 3267 . [65] A.M. Mehedinti, C. Capusa, I. Andreiana, G. Mircescu, Intravenous iron-carbohydrate nanoparticles and their similars. What do we choose? Maedica (Bucur) 17 (2022) 436 – 448 .
| HD | HD | HD | Patientbodyweight | Patientbodyweight | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mmoI/L |
| IV iron sucrose | IV iron sucrose | IV FCM | IV FCM | IV FCM | IV FCM | IV ferric derisomaltose | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toblli et al. [35] | FERRIC-HF [25] | IRON-HF [36】 | FAIR-HF [221 | CONFIRM-HF 【20】 | EFFECT-HF [211 | AFFIRM-AHF [23】 | HEART-FID [38] | IRONMAN [371 | |
| Year Sample size | 2007 40 | 2008 | 2013 | 2009 459 | 2017 172 | 2020 | 2023 | 2022 | |
| Efficacy | 2007 40 | 35 | 18 | 2015 304 | 1108 | 3065 | 1137 | ||
| Efficacy | Significantly | Significantly improved | Increment | Significantly improved | Significantly improved | Favorable | 21% risk | No statistical | 18% risk |
| Efficacy | improved LVEF, | improved peak VO2/kg, | effect on peak VO2, | reduction in the | difference in | reduction of | |||
| Efficacy | MLHFQ | peak VO2/kg, NYHA class | functional | PGA, NYHA class, 6MWT, | 6MWT (from | combined | hierarchical | primary | |
| Efficacy | score, and 6MWT | capacity (increment | Week 24),PGA (from Week 12), | significant | endpoint of total | composite of death within 12 | composite | ||
| Efficacy | score, and 6MWT | (at Week 18), | EQ-5D, KCcQ score | improvement | HE | endpoint of | |||
| Efficacy | score, and 6MWT | in peak | (all from Week4) | NYHA class (from Week 24), | in PGA (from | hospitalization and cV death,b | months after randomization, | recurrent | |
| Efficacy | (from Week 24), fatigue score | Week 12) and NYHA | trend towards | hospitalizations | hospitalizations for HF and CV | ||||
| (at Week 18) | (from Week 12), improved KCCQ | functional | reduction of | for HF within 12 | death,b | ||||
| class (from | hospitalization, | months after | improvements in | ||||||
| and EQ-5D, reduced hospitalization for worsening | Week 6) | no difference in CVdeath | randomization, | MLHFQ score | |||||
| and EQ-5D, reduced hospitalization for worsening | CVdeath between FCM | or change in 6- min walk | and 6MWT | ||||||
| between FCM and placebo | distance from | ||||||||
| Safety | Not reported | baseline to 6 | |||||||
| Generally well-tolerated | months |
| Studies | FAIR-HF2 [48] | PREFER-HF [49] | FAIR-HFpEF [50] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase | |||
| Patient | Chronic HFrEF | HFpEF | |
| population | HFpEF | ||
| Enrollment | 1200 | 200 | |
| Iron compound | FCM | FCM | FCM |
| Comparator | Placebo | Placebo, oral ferroglycine sulfate, oral | Placebo |
| Primary | Composite rate of recurrent HF hospitalizations and CV deaths for a minimum | Change in 6MWT after 24 weeks | Change in 6MWT after 52 |
| endpoint | averagefollow-up of 2years | weeks |
引用 / 出处
2024 专家建议:亚洲心力衰竭患者铁缺乏的管理. 2024.