2026 AHA科学声明:克隆造血作用及其心血管意义

其他 心血管内科· 心脏康复与其他 · 2026

RISK FACTORS FOR CH

Although age is the dominant risk factor for CH, several factors contributing to the risk of developing CH have emerged in the past decade (Supplemental Table 1).$^{6,27,29–32}$ These factors increase the risk for CH either by increasing DNA mutagenesis and thereby increasing the likelihood of acquiring CH-defining sequence variations or by conferring a relative fitness advantage to variant clones facilitating their growth. Herein, we focus on 3 broad categories of CH risk factors beyond chronologic age: germline genetic predisposition, toxic exposures such as chemotherapy, and chronic inflammation. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for both identifying high-risk individuals and developing strategies to mitigate CH-associated cardiovascular risk. Targeted

interventions aimed at these risk factors may offer new avenues for preventing and managing CH-related CVD.

Germline Predisposition

Recent studies have highlighted how inherited common and rare genetic variants shape the landscape of CH.$^{33}$ Recent genome-wide association studies have collectively identified numerous common genetic variants that predispose individuals to CH.$^{29,30}$ The mechanistic link between these germline variants and CH development likely involves regulation of HSC function, DNA repair, and genomic stability. The most prominent is a common variant in the TERT locus, which increases CH risk with an odds ratio of 1.3.$^{34}$ TERT encodes telomerase reverse transcriptase, a key enzyme in maintaining telomere length.$^{35}$ Other loci associated with either increased or reduced CH risk include variants in ATM (odds ratio, 1.46 [1.33–1.60]) or PARP1 (odds ratio, 0.87 [0.84–0.90]).$^{30,36}$ ATM is a key node in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; PARP1 plays a crucial role in DNA repair.

Rare pathogenic variants, like those that give rise to inherited cancer genetic syndromes, can also predispose to CH. Recent work has linked rare pathogenic variants in RUNX1, CHEK2, ATM, TINF2, and PTPN11—a convergence of common and rare variants: targeting the same genes-to a 2- to 10-fold increase in CH risk, Down syndrome, a congenital disorder caused by trisomy 21, also increases the risk of early-onset CH, which may reflect features of premature aging inherent to the syndrome.$^{31}$

Some germline variants show gene-specific effects. For example, a common variant in the TCL1A promoter protects against TET2 CH and ASXL1 CH, but predisposes carriers to DNTM3A CH.$^{29,30}$ Recent experimental work demonstrated that sequence variations in TET2, ASXL1, and other epigenetic regulator genes implicated in CH, but not DNTM3A, increase chromatin accessibility at the TCL1A locus.$^{37}$ This leads to increased expression of TCL1A a proto-oncogene implicated in leukemia, promoting HSC proliferation. A germline variant in the TCL1A promoter restricts this expression, thereby limiting CH expansions. Because DNMT3A is a relatively weak driver of CH expansion, germline TCL1A promoter variants that prevent the outgrowth of other CH clones lead to relatively more DNMT3A CH.$^{38}$ Patients with inherited bone marrow failure disorders are also at an increased risk for CH, which may arise in these circumstances either because of inherited defects in DNA damage repair or in some cases because the acquired CH sequence variation normalizes the germline deficit and relieves baseline HSPC fitness constraints.$^{39}$ Recent data suggest that ancestry may influence CH susceptibility. In a Mexico City cohort, CH frequency was 1.6-fold lower than that observed in the UK Biobank, with an even more pronounced reduction in JAK2-variant CH.

CLINUAL STATEMENTS AND BUDIENES

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

Rhee et al

Whether these disparities are attributable to underlying germline genetic variation, environmental exposures, or other correlated nongenetic factors remains to be determined.$^{40}$ These and other associations highlight the complex interplay between germline genetics and somatic sequence variations in CH development.

Toxin Exposure

Patients with cancer, particularly those exposed to cytotoxic therapies, have an increased prevalence of CH.$^{19,41}$ This phenomenon, termed therapy-related CH (t-CH), is frequently characterized by sequence variations in the DDR pathway genes, such as TP53, PPM1D, CHEK2, and ATM.$^{42}$ Chemotherapy acts as a strong selective pressure, conferring a fitness advantage to HSCs harboring sequence variations in the DDR pathway genes, therein enhancing survival under genotoxic stress.$^{19,43}$ The prevalence of t-CH can be as high as 30% even in relatively young cancer survivors, significantly higher than in age-matched controls.$^{44}$ CH is an emerging and important risk factor in the practice of cardio-oncology, particularly for long-term cancer survivors.

Radiation as a component of cancer treatment leads to 2- to 4-fold increased risk of CH, with risk being dependent on both radiation modality and intensity.$^{45}$ Studies have documented increased risk among individuals with higher exposures to radon.$^{46}$ How space radiation affects CH prevalence is an area of active interest in the community, with implications for cardiovascular health of astronauts embarking on future exploration missions.$^{47}$

Smoking is another well-established risk factor for CH.$^{48}$ Smokers show an increased prevalence of ASXL1-variant CH.$^{49}$ Multiple mechanisms, including both direct DNA damage and chronic inflammation, are likely. CH was significantly more common in World Trade Center first responders, implicating particulate matter as a potential driver.$^{50}$ However, broader associations between air pollution and CH risk have not been established, warranting further investigation.$^{51}$

Chronic Inflammation

Numerous studies in model organisms have demonstrated links between bone marrow inflammation and HSC health.$^{52,53}$ Chronic inflammation, particularly involving cytokines such as those in the IL-6 (interleukin-6) axis, can promote the expansion of variant HSCs and confer their clonal fitness.$^{54,55}$ In turn, dominant clones may activate anti-inflammatory programs to survive the inflammatory signals produced by their own mature cells, creating a self-perpetuating cycle that supports their continued growth. Multiple sources of inflammation have been linked to CH in humans. Human immunodeficiency virus infection is associated with an increased risk of CH.$^{56}$ The chronic immune activation and inflam-

mation characteristic of human immunodeficiency virus infection, such as activated IFN-γ (interferon-γ) signaling, is hypothesized to create a permissive environment for the expansion of variant HSC clones.$^{57}$ Women with premature menopause have an increased risk of CH.$^{58}$ Loss of the protective effects of estrogen on the bone marrow microenvironment may contribute to accelerated aging and increased inflammation, mediating this increased risk. Multiple lifestyle factors related to chronic inflammation have been linked to CH, including obesity and sleep deprivation.$^{59,60}$ These conditions are associated with chronic low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress, which may promote DNA damage and provide a selective advantage to variant clones. A healthy diet was found to be protective against CH risk.$^{61}$ However, the association between chronic inflammation and CH risk appears to be context-dependent. Sickle cell disease—despite driving chronic inflammation and being a known myeloid malignancy risk factor—has not been linked to increased CH risk.$^{62}$

CH AND CVD

The association between CH and CVD has been extensively studied in atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), with numerous studies confirming this relationship.$^{7}$ Studies using diverse case-control cohorts and large population-based cohorts have shown that the strength of the association varies depending on the specific variant genes, the types of sequence variations, clone size or VAF, and baseline CVD risk. Older CH carriers with sequence variations in DNMT3A, TET2, or ASXL1 had a 1.7- to 2-fold increased ASCVD risk compared with those without CH.$^{63}$ Coronary artery calcium scoring with cardiac computed tomography, a well-validated noninvasive measure of coronary atherosclerosis, showed significantly higher CAC scores in CH carriers compared with noncarriers.$^{63}$ Among individuals who had early-onset myocardial infarction, CH was enriched 4-fold compared with older controls.$^{63}$ Moreover, patients with CH were found to have worse outcomes after myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock compared with those without CH.$^{64}$ In the low-risk UK Biobank population, the association between CH and ASCVD has been inconsistent, in part due to variability of CH definition and calling as well as potential host-related factors and heterogeneity in sequence variation effects.$^{30,36,65}$ Other data sets have demonstrated more consistent associations between CH and ASCVD,$^{66}$ highlighting greater ASCVD risks particularly attributed to TET2 and JAK2 sequence variations or larger clones with VAF ≥10%. Nevertheless, the link between CH and recurrent ASCVD events among people with established ASCVD remains inconsistent.$^{66,67}$

More recently, the directional relationship between CH and ASCVD has been explored. Computational modeling has suggested that CH may be a consequence of

CLUNICAL STATEMENTS AND EVIDELINES

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

ASCVD itself, given the established literature on hematopoiesis in response to atherosclerosis.$^{68}$ However, longitudinal studies combining serial assessments of CH with imaging of atherosclerosis and clinical evaluations of ASCVD have demonstrated that atherosclerosis does not appear to drive the development of CH. As such, CH may be unidirectionally associated with the progression of atherosclerosis.$^{27,28}$

Emerging evidence also points to associations between CH and heart failure (HF), including the differential impact of specific CH genes. In a meta-analysis of 56597 individuals without HF at baseline, CH carriers had a 25% higher risk of developing HF, independent of traditional risk factors, and also among those without coronary artery disease. CH overall was not significantly associated with reduced ejection fraction, but gene-specific analysis showed that sequence variations in ASXL1 were associated with modestly reduced ejection fraction.$^{69}$ A separate study involving 8090 participants from 2 prospective cohort studies found a higher cumulative incidence of HF among CH carriers compared with noncarriers.$^{70}$ CH overall was not significantly associated with either HF with preserved or reduced ejection fraction, but gene-specific analysis demonstrated that TET2 sequence variations were 2.4-fold enriched among individuals with HF with preserved ejection fraction versus without. In another study that included patients with HF, CH was linked to a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality, HF-specific death, and HF-related hospitalizations.$^{71}$ Additional studies have also reported that patients with CH and chronic HF had worse survival and prognosis than those with HF but without CH.$^{72}$

Beyond ASCVD and HF, growing evidence suggests a broader association between CH (with variation by gene) and other cardiovascular disorders, including atrial fibrillation,$^{73}$ stroke,$^{74}$ peripheral artery disease,$^{75}$ aortopathy,$^{76}$ and myocarditis.$^{76}$a In addition, recent data suggest that the presence of CH portends a worse prognosis in patients with aortic stenosis after valvular interventions.$^{77}$ CH, particularly involving JAK2 sequence variations, has been linked to an increased risk of thrombosis.$^{78}$ A detailed summary of cardiovascular outcomes associated with CH can be found in Supplemental Table 2.

PATHOGENESIS AND PROPOSED MECHANISMS

The known genetic drivers of CH involve genes that are generally recurrently altered in hematologic malignancies. The most prevalent CH sequence variations occur in DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, which encode epigenetic regulators that can widely affect chromatin structure and transcription factor accessibility. Sequence variations in these genes often result in loss of function, altering HSPC proliferation, self-renewal, or survival. Emerging

evidence also suggests that specific sequence variation sites—particularly missense sequence variations—within CH-driver genes may confer differential functional consequences.$^{79}$ Mechanistic investigations into the association between CH and CVD have mainly used mouse models transplanted with bone marrow cells carrying surrogates of human CH sequence variations (Supplemental Table 3). Several variant genes have been shown to contribute to CVD by primarily exacerbating inflammatory responses, which leads to accelerated atherosclerosis, profibrotic cardiac remodeling, and cardiomyocyte dysfunction.$^{80}$ Thus far, the relative importance of systemic versus direct effects of variant immune cells in the myocardium or atherosclerotic plaques remains unclear.$^{81}$ In mouse models, Y chromosome-deficient cardiac macrophages have been shown to activate profibrotic signaling cascades, resulting in fibroblast activation, extracellular matrix deposition, and impaired myocardial function, thereby supporting a direct pathogenic role within the myocardium.$^{82}$ Further studies are needed to delineate the relative contributions of systemic versus local mechanisms in humans. In addition, although there are some shared inflammatory mechanisms connecting CH to CVD, several distinct mechanisms have been identified for the different driver genes, establishing the basis for potential personalized preventive strategies tailored to carriers of specific CH genotypes.

The effects of TET2 sequence variations on CVD are the best characterized to date. Mouse models of Tet2-variant [CH] exhibit accelerated atherosclerosis and cardiac dysfunction in different settings, driven by heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines by variant macrophages, predominantly, but not exclusively, IL-1β (interleukin 1β) and related cytokines.$^{63,83,84}$ Tet2 inactivation significantly increases II/β transcript levels in macrophages exposed to various pro-inflammatory stimuli,$^{83-85}$ partially mediated by increased histone acetylation at the II/β promoter.$^{83}$ In addition, TET2 (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2)-deficient macrophages exhibit an overactivation of the NLRP3 (Nod-like receptor protein 3) inflammasome, the main regulator of IL-1β maturation and secretion in CVD,$^{83-87}$ leading to an increase in IL-1β secretion.$^{83,85,86}$ In correspondence, humans carrying somatic TET2 sequence variations, but not other CH sequence variations, exhibit elevated circulating levels of IL-1β.$^{29}$ These findings strongly suggest that targeting IL-1β-driven inflammation may be particularly effective for preventing CVD in TET2 sequence variation carriers. Supporting this possibility, pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 or the related cytokine IL-6 has been shown to suppress the effects of Tet2-variant cells on various mouse models of CVD,$^{83,84,87}$ Consistent observations have been made in humans, where an inherited genetic variant that reduces IL-6 signaling (IL6R D358A) mitigates the elevated coronary artery disease risk of TET2 sequence variation

CLIMICAL STATEMENTS AND BUDINEMENTS

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

CLUNICAL STATEMENTS AND BUEDELINES

carriers.$^{65}$ Moreover, a post hoc analysis of CANTOS (Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Outcomes Study) suggests that canakinumab (an IL-1β-neutralizing antibody) versus placebo reduces the risk of ischemic events to a much greater extent in carriers of TET2 sequence variations than in those without CH.$^{88}$ Colchicine, another anti-inflammatory drug known to inhibit IL-1β-driven inflammation, has been shown to mitigate TET2-variant CH-driven atherosclerosis.$^{89}$

Dnnt3a loss-of-function sequence variations have also been shown to promote atherosclerosis and cardiac dysfunction by exerting similar, albeit milder, effects compared with Tet2 sequence variations on the expression of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in murine macrophages.$^{90}$ Furthermore, mouse models of Dnnt3a-variant and Tet2-variant CH harbor distinct tissue resident-like macrophage populations and inflammatory gene expression signatures.$^{90}$ The specific molecular regulatory pathways underlying the proinflammatory effects of Dnnt3a sequence variations remain to be determined. In addition, hematopoietic Dnnt3a loss of function impairs efferocytosis within atherosclerosis plaques, which may contribute to adverse plaque remodeling,$^{91}$ and increases secretion of HB-EGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor), which induces cardiac fibrosis.$^{92}$ Recent studies also highlight the potential involvement of diverse variant immune cells beyond monocytes and macrophages, including CD4+ T cells and natural killer cells, as well as the role of paracrine signaling pathways between variant and wild-type cells, in driving and amplifying inflammatory cascades observed in CH-mediated HF.$^{93}$

Unlike the inactivating sequence variations that occur in TET2 and DNMT3A, ASXL1 sequence variations predominantly occur in the C-terminal exon that encodes a regulatory domain, leading to the expression of a truncated protein. ASXL1 is substantially less studied in the context of CH and CVD, but Asx1/variant CH promotes inflammation and cardiac remodeling after left anterior descending lation in mice, like Tet2- and DNmt3a-variant CH,$^{94}$ and has been found to accelerate atherosclerosis through enhanced myeloid cell inflammation.$^{95}$

The JAK2 V617F variant, a common driver of myeloproliferative neoplasms, has been strongly associated with an increased risk of CVD, myocardial infarction, and arterial and venous thromboembolic risk.$^{6,96,97}$ In many studies of CH, JAK2V617F variant CH is associated with increased platelet and red blood cell counts, suggestive of early myeloproliferative neoplasms rather than benign clonal expansion, but identification of JAK2V617F in 3% to 4% of a general European population by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction-based targeted sequencing (with detection sensitivity of 0.0009%)$^{98}$ suggests the variant may be associated with increased CVD risk even in the absence of increased blood cell counts.$^{97}$ In mouse models of CH, Jak2V617F accelerates venous and arte-

rial thrombosis,$^{96}$ HF after left anterior descending ligation,$^{99}$ atherosclerosis,$^{100}$ and thoracic aortic aneurysm,$^{101}$ through a variety of mechanisms. Thrombotic risk is driven by increased platelet activation, polycythemia, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation,$^{96,97}$ whereas HF involves increased myeloid cell and myocardial inflammation.$^{99}$ Mechanisms of accelerated atherosclerosis of Jak2 V617F CH include increased macrophage proliferation, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species formation, augmented DNA damage, NLRP3 and AIM2 (absent in melanoma 2) inflammasome activation, increased erythrophagocytosis and ferroptosis, and impaired efferocytosis.$^{97,100}$

t-CH involving sequence variations in TP53, PPM1D, ATM, or CHEK2 may occur after cytotoxic therapy for cancer. The expression of these genes can be induced by genotoxic stressors, which are believed to promote the selective expansion of small preexisting clones that harbor DDR pathway sequence variations. Individuals with t-CH are at increased risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and experimental studies suggest that DDR-variant CH may contribute to the late cardiotoxicity observed in patients who have been treated for cancer.$^{102}$ One such study examined the role of Tp53-mediated CH in a mouse model of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy$^{103}$ and found that doxorubicin promoted the expansion of Tp53-3-variant hematopoietic cells, leading to worse cardiotoxicity. Another study demonstrated that inactivating sequence variations in Tp53 accelerated atherosclerosis and increased plaque macrophage burden, mainly due to accelerated macrophage cell cycle kinetics and proliferation.$^{75}$ Although not directly evaluated in the context of atherosclerosis or other vascular conditions, Ppm1d sequence variations linked to CH have been shown to promote fibrotic remodeling of the myocardium in mice infused with angiotensin II.$^{104}$ Similar to other CH driver genes, Ppm1d sequence variations are associated with increased expression of IL-1β, and the pathologic effects of variant Ppm1d on the heart can be reversed by treatment with an NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor in experimental models.$^{104}$

CH can also result from mosaic chromosomal alterations of autosomes and sex chromosomes, although its association with CVD remains unclear, with the exception of loss of Y chromosome.$^{82}$ Mechanistic studies are challenged by the size of the lesions and the individual-to-individual heterogeneity of these molecular events. CH sequence variations in genes such as RNA-splicing factors (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2) are rare and have yet to be explored in experimental models of CVD. Furthermore, studies have reported the existence of frequent hematopoietic clonal events that cannot be attributed to easily identifiable sequence variations in known driver genes, known as CH with unknown drivers.$^{105}$ It is conceivable that some of these clonal events do not have a variant-driven cause,$^{34}$ which makes it challenging

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

to develop experimental models or conduct mechanistic investigations.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

As our understanding of CH continues to evolve, how these insights may be integrated into clinical practice must be considered. Successful clinical translation would require targeted screening strategies to identify at-risk patients with CH, tailored risk prediction models, effective surveillance and therapeutic strategies, and collaborative, multidisciplinary teams to address the diverse health effects of CH.

No official guidelines exist for screening for CH sequence variations. CH is identified incidentally when DNA sequencing is used for other purposes, such as hereditary cancer panel testing, solid tumor evaluations involving circulating tumor or cell-free DNA, and when hematology sequencing panels are used in patients with abnormal blood counts suspected of having a hematologic malignancy.$^{106}$ Several research groups have begun prospective screening studies aimed at evaluating the clinical consequences of CH.$^{107}$ More research is warranted to devise targeted sequencing strategies, particularly for at-risk groups (eg, cancer survivors), and to define appropriate screening intervals, which could enable earlier detection and intervention.

CH risk stratification tools have emerged that assist clinicians in estimating the likelihood of evolution to myeloid neoplasm in patients with CH.$^{24}$ One such tool, the CH risk score, stratifies patients as being at high, intermediate, or low risk for myeloid neoplasm progression, based on factors such as the number of CH sequence variations, clonal size (VAF ≥0.2), and the presence of high-risk sequence variations, among others. Individuals at high risk have a >50% chance of developing blood cancer in 10 years and are monitored more closely than individuals at low risk, who have a <1% risk of the same outcome.$^{24}$ Subsequent analyses using the CH risk score has demonstrated that the model may also be useful for predicting risk of CVD-related death in older adults.$^{108}$ However, the relationship between myeloid malignancy risk and CVD risk in the context of CH remains incompletely understood, supporting the need for a dedicated risk model for CH-associated CVD accounting for the competing risk of myeloid malignancy. Given the dynamic nature of CH, assessing clonal evolution through serial sampling may offer additional prognostic values.

Several tertiary medical centers have developed CHIP clinics for multidisciplinary management and counseling of patients with CH.$^{109}$ These clinics develop risk-specific surveillance and management strategies, primarily focusing on hematologic malignancy, and CH-associated cardiovascular risk may also be evaluated by cardiology or cardio-oncology. Current population-based cardiovascular risk prediction models do not incorporate CH, and

no targeted therapies exist to mitigate CH-associated cardiovascular risk. Therefore, individualized risk assessment and optimization of the cardiovascular risk profile using guideline-concordant primary and secondary prevention are the preferred management strategies for patients with CH.$^{110}$ Beyond cancer and CVD risk, the broad health implications of CH, such as chronic lung disease, fatty liver disease, and endocrinopathies, underscore the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach. As our knowledge of CH advances, these clinics may play an essential role in translating research discoveries into practical, patient-focused care strategies that address wide-ranging health implications of CH.

Clinical trials and interventions in CH are beginning to emerge (Figure 2). Studies to date have focused on myeloid malignancy prevention and targeting high-risk CH; future clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions in CH to mitigate CVD risk are an attractive next step. Therapies targeting specific hematopoietic clones by restoring CH gene function or attenuating clonal expansion may offer potential benefit; vitamin C may restore TET2 function and metformin may reduce DNMT3A-variant clonal fitness.$^{111-113}$ Given the inflammatory sequelae of CH, anti-inflammatory strategies such as inflammasome or cytokine inhibition may prevent cardiovascular risk in patients with CH. Considering the modest but significant infection risk observed in CAN-TOS, maximizing cardiovascular benefit while ensuring infection surveillance may confer a net therapeutic advantage.$^{88}$ When designing trials targeting CH-mediated malignancy or CVD risk, incorporating cardiovascular phenotyping into cancer studies, or malignancy surveillance into cardiovascular studies, may be beneficial, given their shared risk factors and mechanisms.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

CH is increasingly recognized as a potential driver of CVD. Whereas substantial progress has been made in establishing the association of CH with various CVDs, the role of CH as a causal factor, associative marker, or both remains under investigation. In addition, the precise gene-specific mechanisms driving these outcomes remain incompletely understood. Further research should aim to better define the molecular mechanisms through which these sequence variations promote cardiovascular pathology and contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Advances in genomic technologies, such as single-cell transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood cells, may help uncover the functional consequences of CH driver sequence variations and inform targeted therapeutic strategies. In addition, because clonal size has emerged as a key determinant of CH-related CVD, with larger clones linked to greater risk, longitudinal studies with serial blood sampling can offer a more comprehensive understanding of CH dynamics over time, allowing

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUDENIEMES

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

CLIMAL STATEMENTS AND EUBLIMES

![|Therapy|Target|Effect|\n|:---:|:---:|:---:|\n|Prevent clonal expansion|eg. metformin (for DNMT3A CH)|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n|Pharmacologic mimicking of gene restoration|eg. Vitamin C (for TET2 CH)|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n|Inflammosome activation|IL-1β, IL-6, TNFa|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n|Inflammosome inhibitors|eg. NLRP3, AIM2, Caspase inhibitors|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n|Cytokine inhibition|eg. IL-6, IL-1β antibodies or inhibitors|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n|Anti-inflammation|eg. colchicine|Inhibit clonal expansions|\n](1/parseimages/figure01b1f525f4a840d68763e66f1a3c4b32_0_3.png) Figure 2. Potential treatment strategies for clonal hematopoiesis and associated risks.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is associated with aberrant expression of proinflammatory cytokines, which are dually involved in the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies and nonmalignant comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease. Therapeutic prevention strategies are in the early stages of clinical development, with targets including CH clonal reduction and anti-inflammatory targets such as inflammasome pathways and specific cytokines. Figure created with BioRender.com.

for interrogation of the relationship between changes in clone size and CVD risk. Therapeutic approaches for focusing on reducing inflammation hold promise, but prospective clinical studies are necessary to confirm their effectiveness in lowering CH-associated CVD risk. Future research should also explore novel strategies aimed at slowing clonal expansion, thereby preventing disease progression. Incorporating the assessment of CH status into clinical practice is another key step. Development of CVD risk prediction models that integrate CH with traditional cardiovascular risk factors may help clinicians more accurately identify patients at high risk for CVD and tailor therapies accordingly. This personalized approach could allow for earlier and more targeted interventions that reduce the burden of CVD.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a

Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.

This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on August 20, 2025, and the American Heart Association Executive Committee on October 22, 2025. A copy of the document is available at https://professional.heart.org/statements by using either "Search for Guidelines & Statements" or the "Browse by Topic" area. To purchase additional reprints, call 215-356-2721 or email Meredith.Edelman@wolterskluwer.com

The American Heart Association requests that this document be cited as follows: Rhee J-W, Bolton KL, Gupta D, Weeks LD, Bick AG, Tall AR, Walsh K, Fuster JJ, Natarajan P; on behalf of the American Heart Association Molecular Determinants of Cardiovascular Health Committee of the Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and the Cardio-Oncology Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Clonal hematopoiesis and its cardiovascular implications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2026;153:e···e···, doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001404

The expert peer review of AHA-commissioned documents (eg, scientific statements, clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews) is conducted by the AHA Office of Science Operations. For more on AHA statements and guidelines development, visit https://professional.heart.org/statements. Select the "Guidelines & Statements" drop-down menu, then click "Publication Development."

Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the American Heart Association. Instructions for obtaining permission are located at https://www.heartorg/permissions. A link to the “Copyright Permissions Request Form” appears in the second paragraph (https://www.heartorg/en/about-us/statements-and-policies/copyright-request-form).

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

Disclosures

Writing Group Disclosures

|Writing group member|Employment|Research grant|Other research support|Speakers' bureau/ honoraria|Expert witness|Ownership interest|Consultant/ advisory board|Other| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |June-Wha Rhee|City of Hope|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Pradeep Natarajan|Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiovascular Research Center|Allelica (cardiovascular genetics)†; Genentech/ Roche (cardiovascular genetics, trial)†; Cleerly (site-based trial)†; Ionis (site-based trial)†; Amgen (site-based trial)†; Silence Therapeutics (site-based trial)†|Genen-tech, Inc†|None|None|TenSixteen Bio*; Preciseli*; MyOme*; Vertex Pharmaceutical ticals (immediate family members)†; Candela*; Param-eter Health*; Bolt*; Mercury*|Tourmaline Bio*; Genentech Inc*; Novo Nordisk†; Bristol Myers Squibb*|Vertex Pharmaceuticals (immediate family members: senior medical director)†| |Alexander G. Bick|Vanderbilt University Medical Center|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Kelly L. Bolton|Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis|Serviert†|Servier Pharma- ceuticals, LLC†; Serv- vier Bioln- novation†|None|None|None|Server Pharmaceuticals, LLC†|None| |José J. Fuster|National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC; Spain)|Novo Nordisk Foundation†; la Caixa Foundation†; la Marató TV3 Foundation (PI in research grant from not-for-profit foundation for all); Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain)†; Institute of Health Carlos III (Spain)† (PI in research grant from the government for both)|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Dipti Gupta|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Alan R. Tall|New York Presbyte- rian/Columbia Uni- versity Irving Medical Center|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Kenneth Walsh|University of Virginia Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Lachelle D. Weeks|Self-employed|None|None|None|None|None|None|None|

This table represents the relationships of writing group members that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be "significant" if (a) the person receives ≥$5000 during any 12-month period, or ≥5% of the person's gross income; or (b) the person owns ≥5% of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns ≥$5000 of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be "modest" if it is less than "significant" under the preceding definition.

*Modest.

†Significant.

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

Rhee et al

Reviewer Disclosures

|Reviewer|Employment|Research grant|Other research support|Speakers bureau/honoraria|Expert witness|Ownership interest|Consultant/ advisory board|Other| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |Aarti Asnani|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School|NIH (PI on NIH R01 and co-I on 4 NIH R01s); Genentech (PI on sponsored research agreement)†|None|UpDate*|None|Corventum, Inc: equity and patent royalties†|None|None| |Stephen Chung|UT Southwestern Medical Center|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Longhou Fang|Houston Methodist Research Institute|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Adil Ra-sheed|Augusta University|None|None|None|None|None|None|None| |Andreas M. Zeiher|Goethe University Hospital (Germany)|ERC advanced grant CHIP-AVS (CHIP in aortic stenosis)†|None|None|None|None|None|TenSixteen Bio*|

This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be "significant" if (a) the person receives ≥$5000 during any 12-month period, or ≥5% of the person's gross income; or (b) the person owns ≥5% of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns ≥$5000 of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be "modest.

*Modest.

†Significant.

REFERENCES

1. North BJ, Sinclair DA. The intersection between aging and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2012;110:1097–1108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.246876

2. Martin SS, Aday AW, Allen NB, Almarzoq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Bansal N, Beaton AZ, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Committee. 2025 Heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association [published correction appears in Circulation. 2025;151±e1096]. Circulation. 2025;151±e4=666. (602; 151±e4) CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR, CIR,

3. Liberale L, Badimon L, Montecucco F, Luscher TF, Libby P, Camigci. Inflation, aging, and cardiovascular disease: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:837–847, doi: 10.1016/j.12jacc.2021.12.017

4. Ajoolabady A, Pratico D, Vinciguerra M, Lip GYH, Franceschi C, Ren J. Inflam- maging: mechanisms and role in the cardiac and vascialature; Fend: End: Indol. Metab. 2023;34:373-387. doi: 10.1016/j tem.2023.03.005

5. Kumar M, Yan P, Kuchel GA, Xu M. Cellular senescence as a targetable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases: therapeutic implications: JACC family series. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2024;9:522–534. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.12.003

6. Jaiswal S. Fontanllas Fl. Prannick J. Manning A. Grauman PV, Mar BG, Lindsley RC, Mermel CH, Burtt N, Chavez A, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J. Med 2014;371:2488-2498. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408617

7. Libby P, Sidlow R, Lin AE, Gupta D, Jones LW, Moslehi J, Zeher A, Jaiswal, S, Blanchstein R, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis: crossroads of aging, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Collard 2019;74:567–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.007

8. Sleensma DP, Bejar R, Jaisval S, Lindley RC, Sekeres MA, Hasserjan, RP Ebert, Bl. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Bloods. 2015;126:96:16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-633174

9. Genovese G, Kahler AK, Handsaker RE, Lindberg J, Rose SA, Bakhoum SF, Chambert K, Mick E, Neale BM, Fromer M, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. N Engl J Med 2014;37:2477-2487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409405

10. Xie, M. Lu, C. Wang, J. Mcellan MD, Johnson KL, Wdiell M, McMichael JF, Schmidt HK, Yellapantula V, Miller CA, et al. Age-related mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion and malignancies. Nat Med 2014;2014;17:2484. doi: 10.1038/nm/3733

11. Young AL, Challen GA, Birmann BM, Druley TE. Clonal hematopoiesis harbouring AML-associated mutations is ubiquitous in ubiquitous in healthy adults. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12484. doi: 10.1038/ncomms.com12848

12. Nachun D, Lu AT, Bick AG, Natarajan P, Weinstock J, Szeto MD, Kathresian, S. Abecasis G, Taylor RD, Guo X et al; NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision

Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Clonal hematopoiesis associated with epigenetic aging and clinical outcomes. Aging Cell. 2021;20:e13366. doi: 10.1111/cael.13366

13. Uddin MDM, Nguyen NOH, Yu B, Brody JA, Pampana A, Nakao T, Fornage M, Bressler J, Sotoodehnia N, Weinstock JS, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, DNA methylation, and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Commun: 2022;13:5350. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33093-3 CL, Baker-Smith CM, Banal A, Dvergent effects of Dnmt3a and Tet2 mutations on hematopoietic progenitor cell fitness. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:551-560. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.02.011

14. Ostrander EL, Kramer AC, Mallaney C. Celik, H. Koh WK, Fairchild J, Haussler E, Zhang CRC, Challen GA. Divergent effects of Dnmt3a and Tet2 mutations on hematopoietic progenitor cell fitness. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:551–560. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.02.011

15. Comazzetto S, Cassidy DL, DeVilbiss AW, Jeffery EC, Ottesen BR, Reyes AR, Paul Al Bansal S, Xie SZ, Muh S, et al. Ascorbate defi- ciency increases quiescence and self-renewal in hematopoietic stem cells and multiprogenitors. Blood. 2025;145:114-126. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024769

16. Busque L, Patel JP, Figuero ME, Vasanthakumar A, Provost S, Hamilou Z, Molica L, L, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W, W

13. Jacobs KB, Yeager M, Zhou W, Wacholder S, Wang Z, Rodriguez-Santiago B, Hutchinson A, Deng X, Liu C, Horner MJ, et al. Detectable clonal mosa- icism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat Genet. 2012;44:651- 658. doi: 10.1038/ng.2270

18. Takahashi K, Tanaka T. Clonal evolution and hierarchy in myeloid malignants. Trends Cancer: 2023:9:7:715. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.05.004

13. Bolton KL, Ptashkin RN, Gao T, Braunstein L, Devlin SM, Kelly D, Patel M, Berthon A, Syed A, Yabe M, et al. Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 2020;52:1219–1226. doi: 10.1038/s4158-020-00710-0

20. Abelson S, Collord G, Ng SWK, Weissbrod O, Mendelson Cohen N, Niemeyer E, Barda N, Zuzarte PC, Heisler L, Sundaravadaman Y, et. Prediction of acute myelid leukaemia risk in healthy individuals. Nature. 2018;559:400-404. doi: 10.1038/s/a5158-0317-6

21. Watson CJ, Papua AL, Poon GYP, Wong WH, Young AL, Druley TE, Fisher DS, Blundell JR. The evolutionary dynamics and fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis. Science. 2020;367:1449–1454. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9333

22. Rossi M, Meggendorfer M, Zampini M, Tettamanti M, Riva E, Travaglino E, Bersaneli M, Mandelli S, Antonella Galbussera A, Mosca E, et al. Clinical relevance of clonal hematopoiesis in persons aged >/(=80 years. Blood 2021;138:2093-2105. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011320

23. Shizh LL. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis. Blood. 2018;131:496–504. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-746453

24. Weeks LD, Niroula A, Neuberg D, Wong W, Lindsley RC, Luskin M, Berliner N, Stone RM, DeAngelo DJ, Soiffer R, et al. Prediction of risk for myeloid malignancy in clonal hematopoiesis. NEJM Evid. 2023;2:10.1056/evi-d2003210.10.1056/evi-s66/evidoa2200310

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

25. Xie Z, Komrokji R, Al Ali N, Regelson A, Geyer S, Patel A, Saygin C, Zeidan AM, Bewersdorf JP, Mendez L, et al. Risk prediction for clonal cytopenia: multicenter real-world evidence. Blood 2024;144:2033-2044. doi: 10.1182/viod202424756 26. Ma X, Shao Y, Tian L, Flash, Slach DA, Mulder HL, Edmonson MN, Liu Y, Chen X, Newman S, Nakitandwe J, et al. Analysis of error profiles in deep next-generation sequencing data. Genome Bol. 2019;20:50. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1659-6 27. Uddin MM, Saadatagah S, Niroula A, Yu B, Hornsby WE, Ganesh S, Lannery K, Schuans A, Honigberg MC, Bick AG, et al. Long-term longitudinal analysis of 4,187 participants reveals insights into determinants of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Commun. 2024;15:7858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52302-9 28. Diez-Diez M, Ramos-Neble BL, de la Barrera J, Silla-Castro JC, Quintas A, Vazquez E, Rey-Martin MA, Izbi B, Sanchez-Garcia L, Garcia-Lunar I, et al. Unidirectional association of clonal hematopoiesis with atherosclerosis development. Nat Med. 2024;30:2857-2866. doi: 10.1038/s414591-024-3213-1 29. Bick AG, Weinstock JS, Nandakumar SK, Fulco C, BPao EL, Zekavat SM, Szeto MD, Liao X, Leventhal MJ, Nasser J, et al; NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Inherled causes of clonal hematopoiesis in 97,691 whole genomes. Nature. 2020;586:763-768. doi: 10.1038/s414586-020-2819-2 30. Kessler MD, Damask A, O'Keeffe S, Banerjee N, Li D, Watanabe K, Marketta A, Van Meter M, Semrau S, Horowitz J, et al; Regeneron Genetics Center. Common and rare variant associations with clonal haematopoiesis phenotypes. Nature. 2020;6212:301-309. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05448-9 31. Heimlich JB, Bick AG. Somatic mutations in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 2022;130:149-161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA 121:3139809 32. Walsh K, Raghavachari N, Kerr C, Bick AG, Cummings SR, Druley T, Dunbar CE, Genovese G, Goodwell JA Jaiswal S, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis analyses in clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic aging studies to unravel underlying mechanisms of age-related dysfunction in humans. Front Aging, 2022;3841796. doi: 10.1338/s0742/2849.1796 33. Liu J, Osman AEG, Bolton K, Godley LA. Germline predisposition to clonal hematopoiesis. Leuk Res. 2023;132:107344. doi: 10.1016/jleukres.2023.107344 34. Zink F, Stacey SN, Nordahl GL, Frigge ML, Magnusson OT, Jonsdottir I, Thorgeirsson TE, Sigurdsson A, Gudjonsson SA, Gudmundsson J, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis, with and without维护 candidate driver mations, is common in the elderly. Blood. 2017;130:742-752. doi: 10.1182/viod.2017-02-769689 35. Nakao T, Bick AG, Taub MA, Zekavat SM, Uddin MM, Niroa A, Carty CL, Lane J, Honigberg MC, Weinstock JS, et al; Samoan Obesity. Lifestyle and Genetic Adgetics Study. (OLGA) Group. NHBL Trie-Km-Cm for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Mendelian randomization supports bidirectional causality between telomere length and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Sci Adv. 2022;8:seab16579. doi: 10.1126/sciadvabl6579 36. Kar SP, Quiros PM, Gu M, Jiang T, Mitchell J, Langdon R, ler y, Barcena C, Vijavabaskar MS, Fabre MA, et al. Genome-wide analyses of 200,453 individuals yield new insights into the causes and consequences of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet 2022;54:1155-1166. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-0121-z1 37. Weinstock JS, Gopakumar J, Burugula BB, Uddin MM, Niah N, Belk JA, Bouzid H, Daniel B, Miao Z, Ly N, et al. NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Abernt activation of TCL1A promotes stem cell expansion in clonal haematopoiesis. Nature. 2023;616:755-763. doi: 10.1038/s414586-023-05806-1 38. Mack T, Pershad Y, Vlassachaert C, Bejan CA, Heimlich JB, Li Y, Mickels NA, Van Amburg JC, Ulaa J, Silver AJ, et al. Germline genetics, disease, and exposure to medication influence longitudinal dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis. Haematologica. 2024;110:1010-1018. doi: 10.1032/snaemat.2024;286513 39. Tsai FD, Lindsley RC. Clonal hematopoiesis in the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Blood 2020;136:1615-1622. doi: 10.1182/viod2019000990 40. Wen S, Kuri-Morales P, Hu F, Nag A, Tachmazidou I, Deevi SVV, Taiy H, Smith KR, Loesch DP, Burren OS, et al. Comparative analysis of the Mexico City Prospective Study and the UK Biobank identifies anerstpecific effects on clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet 2025;57:572-582. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02085-6 41. Mayerhofer C, Sedrak MS, Hopkins JO, Li T, Tai, Yob N, Faggen MG, Sinclair W, Chen WY, Parsons HA, Mayer EL, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in alder

patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115:981-988. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad065 42. Coombs CC, Zehir A, Dewlin SM, Kishtagari A, Syed A, Jonsson P, Hyman DM, Solit DB, Robson ME, Baselga J, et al. Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis in patients with non-hematologic cancers is common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:374-382.e4. doi: 10.1016/jstem.2017207010 43. Wong TN, Ramsingh G, Young AL, Miller CA, Touma W, Welch JS, Lamprecht TL, Shen D, Hundal J, Fulton RS, et al. Role of TP53 mutations in the origin and evolution of therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2015;518:552-555. doi: 10.1038/nature13968 44. Gibson CJ, Fell G, Sella T, Sperling AS, Snow C, Rosenberg SM, Kirkner G, Pat Al, Dillon B, Dick AG, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in young women treated for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29:2551-2558. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0050 45. Crants SA, Olson SS, Li Y, Bejan CA, Vlasschaert C, Mack TM, Persshad Y, Kishtagari A, Reed SC, Corossmann S, et al. Risk of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential after cancer radiation therapy. medRxiv. Preprint posted september 28, 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.27:24314321 46. Anthony KM, Collins JM, Love SM, Stewart JD, Buchheit SF, Gondalia R, Schwartz GG, Huang DY, Meliker JR, Zhang Z, et al. Radon exposure, clonal hematopoiesis, and stroke susceptibility in the Women's Health Initiative. Neurology: 2024;102:20208055. doi: 10.1212/WNL.000000000000208055 47. Mencia-Trinchant N, Macay MJ, Chin C, Afshinnekoo E, Foxo J, Meydan C, Butler D, Mozysary C, Vernice NA, Darby C, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis before, during, and after human spaceflight. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108458. doi: 10.1016/j.incelrep.2020.108458 48. Levin MG, Nakao T, Zekavat SM, Koyama S, Bick AG, Niroula A, Ebert B, Damrauer SM, Natarajan P. Genetics of smoking and risk of clonal hematopoiesis. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:7248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09604-z 49. Dawdau AZ, Tapper WU, Cross NCP. Clonal myelopoisies in the UK Biobank cohort: ASXL1 mutations are strongly associated with smoking. Leukemia. 2020;34:2660-2672. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0896-8 50. Israas S, Girco O, Zeig-Owen R, Pradhan K, Goldfarb DG, Barreto-Galvez A, Silver AJ, Chen J, Sahu S, Gordon-Mitchell S, et al. High burden of clonal hematopoiesis in first responders exposed to the World Trade Center disaster. Nat Med 2022;28:468-471. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01708-3 51. Leiser CL, Whitsel EA, Reiner A, Rich SS, Rotter JI, Taylor KD, Tracy RP, Kooperberg C, Smith AV, Manson JE, et al. Associations between ambient air pollutants and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023;32:1470-1473. doi: 10.1182/105-99685.EFF-23-0305 52. Florez MA, Tran BT, Wathan TK, DeGregori J, Pietras EM, King KY. Clonal hematopoiesis: mutation-specific adaptation to environmental change. Cell Ster Cell 2022;98:904. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2022.05.006 53. Avagyan S, Zon LI. Clonal hematopoiesis and inflammation: the perpetual cycle. Trends Cell Biol 2023;33:695-707. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.12.001 54. Shin TH, Zhou Y, Chen S, Cordes S, Grice MZ, Fan X, Lee BC, Aljanahi AA, Hong SG, Vaughan KL, et al. A macaque clonal hematopoiesis model demonstrates expansion of ET2-disrupted clones and utility for testing interventions. Blood. 2022;140:1748-1789. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014875 55. Avagyan S, Henninger JE, Mannherz WP, Misty M, Yoon J, Yang S, Weber MC, Moore, IL. Zon. Li resistance to inflammation underlies enhanced fitness in clonal hematopoiesis. Science. 2021;374:768-772. doi: 10.1126/science.aba9304 56. Charan NL, Yeh F, Bloch M, Yeung MM, Baker D, Guinto J, Roth N, Ftoni S, Ognovenska K, Smith D, et al. ARCHIVE Study Group. HIV is associated with an increased risk of age-related clonal hematopoiesis among older adults. Nat Med 2021;277:1006-1101. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01357-y 57. Hormaechea-Agulla D, Matatall KA, Le DT, Kain B, Long X, Kus P, Jaksik R, Challen GA, Kimmel M, King KY. Chronic infection drives Dnmt3as-loss-of-function clonal hematopoiesis via IFNgamma signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:1428-1442.6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.03.002 58. Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Niroula A, Griffin GK, Bick AG, Pirruccello JP, Nakao T, Whitel EA, Farland LV, Laurie C, et al. NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program. Premature menopause, clonal hematopoiesis, and coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2021;143:410-423.001.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.05.01775 59. Pasupuleti SK, Ramdas B, Burns SS, Palam LR, Kanumuri R, Kumar R, PandhiR, TRE Dave, UPJelapu NK, Zhou X, et al. Obesity-induced inflammation exacerbates clonal hematopoiesis. J Clin Invest. 2023;133:e163968. doi: 10.1172/JC163968 60. Haring B, Reiner AP, J, Tobias DK, Whitsel E, Berger JS, Desai P, Wassertheil-Smloller S, LaMonte MJ, Hayden KM, et al. Healthy lifestyle

CLIMUAL STATEMENTS AND GUDINES

CLIMUAL STATEMENTS AND EREDUËNIS

Rhee et al

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential: results from the Women's Health Initiative. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021:10:e018789. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018789 61. Battacharya R, Zekavat SM, Uddin MM, Pirruccello J, Niiroua A, Gibson C, Griffin GK, Libby P, Ebert BL, Bick A, et al. Association of diet quality with prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis and adverse cardiovascular events. JAMA Cardol 2021:61e069-1077, doi: 10.1001/jamacio.2021.1678 62. Liggett LA, Cato LD, Weinstock JS, Zhang Y, Nouraie SM, Gladwin MT, Garrett ME, Ashley-Koch A, Telen MJ, Custer B, et al; NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed). Consortium, Clonal hematopoiesis in sick-le cell disease. J Clin Invest. 2022;132e156060. doi: 10.1172/JCI156060 63. Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, Gibson CJ, Bick AG, Shvartz E, Mconkey M, Gupta N, Gabriel S, Ardissino D, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:111-121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMao1701719 64. Bohme H, Des S, Rosolowski M, Scholz M, Krohn K, Buttner P, Cross M, Kirchberg J, Rommel KP, Poss J, et al. Impact of clonal hematopoiesis of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:1545-1556. doi: 10.1016/jлас.2022.08:2476 65. Vlassacheert C, Heimlich JB, Rauh MJ, Natarajan P, Bick AG. Interleuin-6 receptor polymorphism attenuates clonal hematopoiesis-mediated coronary artery disease risk among 451180 individuals in the UK Biobank. Circulation 2023;147:358–360. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA-123.062126 66. Marston NA, Pirruccello JP, Melloni GEM, Kamanu F, Bonaca MP, Giugliano RP, Scirica BM, Wviett SD, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis, cardiovascular events and treatment benefit in 63700 individuals from five TiMI randomized trials. Nat Med. 2024;30:2641–2647. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03188-z 67. Gumuser ED, Schuermans A, Cho SLM, Sporn ZA, Uddin MM, Paruchuri K, Nakao T, Yu Z, Haidermota S, Hornsby W, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential predicts adverse outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1996–2009. doi: 10.1016/j/jacc.2023.03.041 68. Heyde A Rohd, McAlpine CS, Zhang S, Hoyer FF, Gerold JM, Cheek D,�wamato Y, Schloss MJ, Vandoorne K, et al. Increased stem proliferation in atherosclerosis accelerates clonal hematopoiesis. Cell. 2021;184:1348–136122: doi: 10.1016/jcell2021.01.049 69. Ju B, Roberts MB, Raffield LM, Zekavat SM, Nguyen NQH, Biggs ML, Brown MR, Griffin G, Desai P, Correa A, et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute TOPMed Consortium. Supplemental association of clonal hematopoiesis with incident heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:42–52. doi: 10.1016/jacc.2021.04.085 70. Schuermans A, Honigberg MC, Raffield LM, Yu B, Roberts MB, Kooperberg C, Desai P, Carson AP, Shah AM, Ballantyne CM, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and incident heart falu with preserved period fraction, AMA Név G, 2024;7e2353244. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53244 71. Pascual-Figal DA, Bayes-Genis A, Diez-Diez M, Hernandez-Vicente A, Vazquez-Andres D, de la Barrera J, Vazquez E, Quintas A, Zuriaga MA, Asensio-Lopez MC, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of progression of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1477-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.jjacc.2021.02.028 72. Dorsheimer L, Assmus B, Rasper T, Ortmann CA, Ecke A, Abou-El-Ardat K, Schmid T, Brune B, Wagner S, Serve H, et al. Association of mutations contributing to clonal hematopoiesis with prognosis in chronic ischemic heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:25–33. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3965 73. Ahn H, Au, HYy, Ru G, Lim J, Sun C, Song H, Choi SY, Lee L, Maurer T, Nachun D, et al. Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and atrial fibrillation: an East Asian cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:778–790. doi: 10.1093/eurheart/ehad869 74. Bhattacharya R, Zekavat SM, Haessler J, Fornage M, Raffield L, Uddin MM, Bick AG, Narliou A, Yu B, Gibson C et al; NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program. Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with higher risk of stroke. Stroke. 2022;53:788–797. doi: 10.1161/STROKEHAIA.12.037388 75. Zekavat SM, Viana-Huete V, Matesanz N, Jorshery SD, Zuriaga MA, Uddin MM, Tinder M, Paruchuri K, Zorita V, Ferrer-Perez A et al. TP53-mediated clonal hematopoiesis confers increased risk for incident atherosclerotic disease. Nat Cardiovasc Res 2023;2:144–158. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00206-6 76. Nakao T, Yu Z, Vlasschaert C, Uddin MM, Lindsay ME, Ellinor PT, Ebert BL, Bick AG, Pirrucolo JIF, Natarajan P. Increased risk of thoracic aortic aneurysms with JAK2 V671F. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:218-228.130. doi: 10.1016/j.acc.2023.03.413

76a. Schuermans A, Flynn S, Niiroula A, Uddin MM, Sinnaeve P, Budts W, Conrad N, Ebert, BL, Libby P, Lin AE, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of new-onset myocarditis and pericarditis. JAMA Cardiol. 2025;10:1147–1156. doi: 10.1001/jamacardico.2025.3369 77. Mas-Peiro S, Hofftischer S, Dorsheimer L, Rieger MA, Dimmeler S, Vasa-Nicotera M, Zeiher AM. Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcath-eter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:933–939. doi: 10.1093/eurheart/ehz591 78. Yokokawa T, Misaka T, Kimishima Y, Wada K, Minakawa K, Kaneshiro T, Yoshihisa A, Ikeda K, Takaiishi Y. Clonal hematopoiesis and JAK2V617F mutations in patients with cardiovascular disease. JACC Cardioncol. 2021;3:134–136. doi: 10.1016/jjaccoa.2021.01.001 79. Huang YH, Chen CW, Sundaramurthy V, Slabicki M, Hao D, Watson CJ, Toy A, Reyes JM, Dakhova O, Crovetti BR, et al. Systematic profiling of DNMT3A variants reveals protein instability mediated by the DCAF8 E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:220–235. doi: 10.1158/2159-9200CD-21-0560 80. Tall AR, Fuster JJ. Clonal hematopoiesis in cardiovascular disease and therapeutic implications. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1:116–124. doi: 10.1038/s441672-0015-3 81. Dederichs TS, Yerdenova A, Horstmann H, Vico TA, Nubling S, Peyronnet R, Pfeier D, von Zur Muehlen C, Heidt T, Wolf D, et al. Nonpreferential but detrimental accumulation of macrophages with clonal hematopoiesis-driven mutations in cardiovascular tissues: brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2024;4:44-697–697. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.320183 82. Sano S, Horitani K, Ogawa H, Halvardson J, Chavkin NW, Wang Y, Sano M, Mattisson J, Hata A, Danielsson M, et al. Hematopoietic loss of Y chromosome leads to cardiac fibrosis and heart failure mortality. Science. 2022;377-292–297. doi: 10.1126/science.abn3100 83. Fuster JJ. Mac, Zuriaga MA, Solacki MN, Ostriker AC, Chakraborty R, Wu CL, Sano S, Muralidharan S, Rius C, et al. Clon-al hematopoiesis associated with TET2 deficiency accelerates ath-erosclerosis development in mice. Science. 2017;355:842–847. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1381 84. Sano S, Oshima K, Wang Y, MacLauchlan S, Kafanasaka Y, Sano M, Zuriaga MA, Yoshiyama M, Goukassian D, Cooper MA, et al. Tet2-mediated clonal hematopoiesis accelerates heart failure through a mechanism involving the IL-1beta/NLRP3 inflammasome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:875–886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijacc.2017:12:037 85. Fuster JJ, Zuriaga MA, Zarita V, MacLauchlan S, Polackal MN, Viana-Huete V; Førre-Pelz A, Mateszanz N, Herrero-Cervera A, Sano S, et al. TET2-Loss-of-function-driven clonal hematopoiesis exacerbates experimental insulin resistance in aging and obesity. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108326. doi: 10.1016/bolep.2020.108326 86. Yalcinkaya M, Liu W, Tomas LA, Olszewska M, Xiao T, Abramowicz S, Papapetrou EP, Westerp M, Wang N, Tabas I, et al. BRCC3-mediated NLRP3 debiquity治理 promotes inflammasome activation and atherosclerosis in Tet2 clonal hematopoiesis. Circulation. 2023;148:1764–1777. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATION.AHA.123.065344 87. Lin AE, Bapat AC, Xiao L, Niroula A, Ye J, Wong WJ, Agrawal M, Farady CJ, Boettcher A, Hergot CB, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential with loss of Tet2 enhances risk for atrial fibrillation through Nlrp3 inflammasome activation. Circulation. 2024;149:1419–1434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATION.AHA.123.065597 88. Svensson EC, Madar A, Campbell CD, He Y, Sultan M, Healey ML, Xu H, D’Aco K, Fernandez A, Wache-Mainier C, et al. TET2-driven clonal hematopoiesis and response to canakinumab: an exploratory analysis of the CANTOS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:521–528. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0386 89. Zuniaga MA, Yu Z, Mateszanz N, Truong B, Ramos-Neble BL, Asensio-Lopez MC, Uddin MM, Nakao T, Niroula A, Zorita V, et al. Colchicine prevents accelerated atherosclerosis in TET2-mutant clonal haematopoiesis. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:461–4615. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae546 90. Rauch PJ, Gopakumar J, Silver AJ, Nachun D, Ahmad H, McConkey M, Nakao T, Bosse M, Rentz T, Vivanco Gonzalez N, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in Dmitrla and Tet2 lead to accelerated atherosclerosis and condort macrophage Res. 2023;2:805–818. doi: 10.1038/s44161-023-00326-7 91. Ampomah PB, Cai B, Sukka SR, Gerlach BD, Yurdagul A Jr, Wang X, Kuriakose G, Darville LNF, Sun Y, Sidoli S, et al. Macrophages use apoptotic cell-derived methionine and DNMT3A during efferocyto-sis to promote tissue resolution. Nat Metab. 2022;4:444–457. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00551-7

Clonal Hematopoiesis: Cardiovascular Implications

Rhee et al

92. Shumliakivska M, Luxan G, Hemmerling I, Scheller M, Li X, Muller-Tidow C, Schuhmacher B, Sun Z, Dendorfer A, Debes A, et al. DNMT3A clonal hematopoiesis-driven mutations induce cardiac fibrosis by paracrine activation of fibroblasts. Nat Commun. 2024;15:606. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43003-93. 93. Abplanalp WT, Schuhmacher B, Cremer S, Merten M, Shumliakvikska M, Macinkovic, L Zeiher AM, John D, Dimmeler S, Cell-intrinsic effects of clonal hematopoiesis in heart failure. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2023;2:819-834. doi: 10.1038/s44161-023-00322-x 94. Min KD, Polizio AH, Kour A, Thel MC, Walsh K. Experimental ASXL1-mediated clonal hematopoiesis promotes inflammation and accelerates heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:026154. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026154. 95. Sato N, Goyama S, Chang YH, Miyawaki M, Fujino T, Koide S, Denda T, Liu X, Ueda K, Yamamoto K, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis-related mutant ASXL1 promotes atherosclerosis in mice via dysregulated innate immunity. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024;3:1568-1583. doi: 10.1038/s44161-024-00579-w 96. Wolach O, Sellar RS, Martinod K, Cherpokova D, McConkey M, Chappell RJ, Silver AJ, Adams D, Castellano CA, Schneider RK, et al. Increased neutrophil extracellular trap formation promotes thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaan8292. doi: 10.1126/scultranslmedaan82929 97. Liu W, Ostberg N, Yalcinkaya M, Dou H, Endo-Umeda K, Tang Y, Hou X, Xiao T, Fidler TP, Abramowicz S, et al. Erythroid lineage Jak2V617F expression promotes atherosclerosis through erythropagocytosis and macrophage ferroptosis. J Clin Invest. 2022;132:1527542. doi: 10.1172/jci155724 98. Cordua S, Kjaer L, Skov V, Pallisgaard N, Hasselbach HC, Ellervik C. Prevalence and phenotypes of JAK2 V617F and calricentu mutations in a Danish general population. Blood. 2019;134:469-479. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001113 99. Sano S, Wang Y, Yura Y, Sano M, Oshima K, Yang Y, Katanasaka Y, Min KD, Matsuura S, Ravid K, et al. JAK2 (V617F)-mediated clonal hematopoiesis accelerates pathological remodeling in murine heart failure. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4:684-697. doi: 10.1016/j.actsb.2019.05.013 100. Fider TP. Xue C, Yalcinkaya M, Hardaway B, Abramowicz S, Xiao T, Liu W, Thomas DG, Hajebrahimi MA, Pircher J, et al. The AIM2 inflamma-some exacerbates atherosclerosis in clonal haematopoiesis. Nature. 2021;592:296-301, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03341-5 101. Al-Rifai R, Vandestienne M, Lavillegrand JR, Mirault T, Cornebise J, Poisson J, Laurans L, Esposito B, James C, Mansier O, et al. JAK2V617F mutation drives vascular resident macrophages toward a pathogenic phenotype and promotes dissecting aortic aneurysm. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34469-1 102. Yura Y, Cochran JD, Walsh K. Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis: a new link between cancer and cardiovascular disease. Heart Fail Clin. 2022;18:349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2022.02.010

103. Sano S, Wang Y, Ogawa H, Horitani K, Sano M, Polizio AH, Kour A, Yura Y, Doviak H, Walsh K. TP53-mediated therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis contributes to doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy by augmenting a neutrophil-mediated cytotoxic response. JCI Insight. 2021;6:146076. doi: 10.1172/jc.insight.146076 104. Yura Y, Miura-Yura E, Katanasaka Y, Min KD, Chavkin N, Polizio AH, Ogawa H, Horitani K, Doviak H, Evans MA, et al. The cancer therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis driver gene Ppm1d promotes inflammation and non-ischemic heart failure in mice. Circ Res. 2021;129:684-698. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319314 105. Mitchell E, Spencer Chapman M, Williams N, Dawson KJ, Mende N, Calderbank EF, Jung H, Mitchell T, Coorens THH, Spencer DH, et al. Clonal dynamics of haematopoiesis across the human lifespan. Nature. 2022;606:343-350. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04786-y 106. Weeks LD, Ebert BL. Causes and consequences of clonal hematopoiesis. Blood. 2023;142:2235-2246. doi: 10.1182/blood.20230222222 107. Shannon ML, Heimlich JB, Olson S, Debevec A, Copeland Z, Kishtagari A, Vasschaert C, Snider C, Silver AJ, Brown D, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and inflammation in the vasculature: CHIVE, a prospective, longitudinal clonal hematopoiesis short and biorepository. Blood Adv. 2024;8:3453-3463. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023011510 108. Saadatagah S, Uddin MM, Weeks LD, Nirula A, Ru M, Takahashi K, Gondek L, Yu B, Bick AG, Ebert BL, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis risk score and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in older adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2351927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51927 109. Bolton KL, Zehir A, Ptashkin RN, Patel M, Gupta D, Sidlow R, Papaemanmuil E, Berger MF, Levine RL. The clinical management of clonal hematopoiesis: creation of a clonal hematopoiesis clinic. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020;34:357-367. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.11.006 110. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Broker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice (published correction appears in Circulation. 2020;141:e774). Circulation, 2019;140:e596-e646. doi: 10.1016/CIR.00000000000000678 111. Cummino L, Dolgale L, Wang Y, Yoshimi A, Martin GH, Wang J, Ng V, Xia B, Witkowski MT, Mitchell-Flack M, et al. Restoration of TET2 function blocks aberrant self-renewal and leukemia progression. Cell. 2017;170:1079-1095e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.032 112. Gozdecka M, Dudek M, Wen S, Gu M, Stopforth RJ, Rak J, Damaskou A, Grice GL, McLoughlin MA, Bond L, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism sustains DNMT3A-R882-mutant clonal haematopoiesis. Nature. 2025;642:431-441. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-086-025-08980-6 113. Hosseini M, Voisin V, Chegini A, Varesi A, Cathelin S, Ayyathan DM, Liu ACH, Yang Y, Wang V, Maher A, et al. Metformin reduces the competitive advantage of Dnmt3a(R878H) HSPCs. Nature. 2025;642:421-430. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08871-w

CLIMPAL STATEMENTS AND GUDIENTES

表 1
Writing group memberEmploymentResearch grantOther research supportSpeakers' bureau/ honorariaExpert witnessOwnership interestConsultant/ advisory boardOther
June-Wha RheeCity of HopeNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Pradeep NatarajanMassachusetts General Hospital Cardiovascular Research CenterAllelica (cardiovascular genetics)†; Genentech/ Roche (cardiovascular genetics, trial)†; Cleerly (site-based trial)†; Ionis (site-based trial)†; Amgen (site-based trial)†; Silence Therapeutics (site-based trial)†Genen-tech, Inc†NoneNoneTenSixteen Bio*; Preciseli*; MyOme*; Vertex Pharmaceutical ticals (immediate family members)†; Candela*; Param-eter Health*; Bolt*; Mercury*Tourmaline Bio*; Genentech Inc*; Novo Nordisk†; Bristol Myers Squibb*Vertex Pharmaceuticals (immediate family members: senior medical director)†
Alexander G. BickVanderbilt University Medical CenterNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Kelly L. BoltonWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisServiert†Servier Pharma- ceuticals, LLC†; Serv- vier Bioln- novation†NoneNoneNoneServer Pharmaceuticals, LLC†None
José J. FusterNational Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC; Spain)Novo Nordisk Foundation†; la Caixa Foundation†; la Marató TV3 Foundation (PI in research grant from not-for-profit foundation for all); Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain)†; Institute of Health Carlos III (Spain)† (PI in research grant from the government for both)NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Dipti GuptaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Alan R. TallNew York Presbyte- rian/Columbia Uni- versity Irving Medical CenterNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Kenneth WalshUniversity of Virginia Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research CenterNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Lachelle D. WeeksSelf-employedNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
表 2
ReviewerEmploymentResearch grantOther research supportSpeakers bureau/honorariaExpert witnessOwnership interestConsultant/ advisory boardOther
Aarti AsnaniBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical SchoolNIH (PI on NIH R01 and co-I on 4 NIH R01s); Genentech (PI on sponsored research agreement)†NoneUpDate*NoneCorventum, Inc: equity and patent royalties†NoneNone
Stephen ChungUT Southwestern Medical CenterNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Longhou FangHouston Methodist Research InstituteNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Adil Ra-sheedAugusta UniversityNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Andreas M. ZeiherGoethe University Hospital (Germany)ERC advanced grant CHIP-AVS (CHIP in aortic stenosis)†NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneTenSixteen Bio*
图示:原图识别中
图示:|Therapy|Target|Effect| |:---:|:---:|:---:| |Prevent clonal expansion|eg. metformin (for DNMT3A CH)|Inhibit clonal expansions| |Pharmacologic mimicking of gene restoration|eg. Vitamin C (for TET2 CH)|Inhibit clonal expansions| |Inflammosome activation|IL-1β, IL-6, TNFa|Inhibit clonal expansions| |Inflammosome inhibitors|eg. NLRP3, AIM2, Caspase inhibitors|Inhibit clonal expansions| |Cytokine inhibition|eg. IL-6, IL-1β antibodies or inhibitors|Inhibit clonal expansions| |Anti-inflammation|eg. colchicine|Inhibit clonal expansions|

引用 / 出处

2026 AHA科学声明:克隆造血作用及其心血管意义. 2026.